Tuesday, 31 December 2002
- Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
- Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
Friday, 27 December 2002
Tuesday, 24 December 2002
Monday, 23 December 2002
- Re: Validation of XHTML documents containing RDF metadata
- Validation of XHTML documents containing RDF metadata
Thursday, 19 December 2002
Monday, 16 December 2002
Sunday, 15 December 2002
Saturday, 14 December 2002
Friday, 13 December 2002
Thursday, 12 December 2002
- Re: Syntax and Primer: URI for XML Schema
- Re: Syntax and Primer: URI for XML Schema
- Re: Syntax and Primer: URI for XML Schema
- Re: Syntax: please add N-Triples to the examples
- Re: Syntax and Primer: URI for XML Schema
- RE: rdf:nodeID and external entities?
- Syntax and Primer: URI for XML Schema
- Re: Syntax: please add N-Triples to the examples
- Syntax: please add N-Triples to the examples
Wednesday, 11 December 2002
Friday, 6 December 2002
- Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
- Re: Comment on RDF Schema 1.0 dated 12 Nov. 2002
- Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
Thursday, 5 December 2002
- Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
- Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
- Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
- Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
- Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
- Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
Wednesday, 4 December 2002
- Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
- Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/)
- Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/)
- Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/)
- Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
- Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
- RE: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
Tuesday, 3 December 2002
- Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/)
- Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/)
- Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/)
- Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
- Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/)
- Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
- RE: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
- Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
- Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
- Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
- RE: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
- Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
- RE: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
- Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
Monday, 2 December 2002
- Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
- questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
- Re: Seeking normative definition of datatyping
- Seeking normative definition of datatyping
- Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID
- Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID
- Re: questions about syntax document and n-triples
- Re: XPointer
Friday, 29 November 2002
Thursday, 28 November 2002
- Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID
- Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID
- Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID
- Re: XPointer
- Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID
- Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID
- Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID
- Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID
- Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID
- Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID
- problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID
- questions about syntax document and n-triples
- Re: XPointer
- Re: XPointer
- XPointer
- Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
Wednesday, 27 November 2002
- RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
- RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
- Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
- Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
- Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
- Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
- RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
- Re: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
- Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
Tuesday, 26 November 2002
- Resume computer information systems CA CO http://hometown.aol.com/gmasley
- comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
- RE: Datatype was RE: Confusion about Collections
- RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
- Entailment
- RDF for working programmers?
- Re: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
- Re: Datatype was RE: Confusion about Collections
- Re: Confusion about Collections
- Re: Datatype was RE: Confusion about Collections
- Re: Datatype was RE: Confusion about Collections
- RE: Datatype was RE: Confusion about Collections
- Re: Datatype was RE: Confusion about Collections
- RE: Datatype was RE: Confusion about Collections
- RE: Confusion about Collections
- RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
- Re: Datatype was RE: Confusion about Collections
- Re: Confusion about Collections
Monday, 25 November 2002
- Re: Confusion about Collections
- Datatype
- Re: Confusion about Collections
- Re: Confusion about Collections
- RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
- RE: Confusion about Collections
- Re: Confusion about Collections
- RE: Confusion about Collections
- Datatype was RE: Confusion about Collections
- RE: Confusion about Collections
- Re: Confusion about Collections
- RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
- Re: updated validator?
- RDF datatyping
- updated validator?
- RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
- Confusion about Collections
- RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
- RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
- RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
- RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
- Re: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
- Re: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
Saturday, 23 November 2002
- RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
- Re: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
- Re: ERD for library system
Friday, 22 November 2002
- SChema TODO: Re: Description of rdfs:isDefinedBy in RDF Schema WD
- Description of rdfs:isDefinedBy in RDF Schema WD
- Re: RDF MT: rdfs interpretations of subClassOf and subPropertyOf
- RE: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model
- Re: XML literals in RDF/XML Syntax Specification (8 Nov 2002)
- Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
- Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model
Thursday, 21 November 2002
- Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
- Re: Vocabulary / Semantics
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
- Re: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
- Re: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
- Re: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
- Re: Vocabulary / Semantics
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
Wednesday, 20 November 2002
Thursday, 21 November 2002
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
Wednesday, 20 November 2002
- Re: RDF MT: rdfs interpretations of subClassOf and subPropertyOf
- Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model
- Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model
- Re: Errors in RDF Test Cases of 12 Nov 2002(?)
- RDF MT: rdfs interpretations of subClassOf and subPropertyOf
Tuesday, 19 November 2002
- Re: reification in RDF
- Re: reification in RDF
- Re: reification in RDF
- reification in RDF
- Re: Errors in RDF Test Cases of 12 Nov 2002(?)
- Re: Comment on RDF/XML Syntax Spec Revised Dated 8 Nov 2002
- Errors in RDF Test Cases of 12 Nov 2002(?)
Monday, 18 November 2002
- Re: RDF and mixed content
- Re: Comments on abstract syntax
- Re: RDF and mixed content
- Re: Comments on the new RDF Concepts and ADM Draft
- Re: Comments on RDF: Concepts and Abstract Data Model
- Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model
- Re: RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model: semantics
- XML literals in RDF/XML Syntax Specification (8 Nov 2002)
- Comment on RDF/XML Syntax Spec Revised Dated 8 Nov 2002
- Re: Comment on RDF Schema 1.0 dated 12 Nov. 2002
Sunday, 17 November 2002
Friday, 15 November 2002
Thursday, 14 November 2002
- RE: Regarding new working drafts
- RE: Regarding new working drafts
- RE: Regarding new working drafts
- Re: Regarding new working drafts
- Re: Regarding new working drafts
- Re: Regarding new working drafts
- Regarding new working drafts
- MTP――管理人员培训
Wednesday, 13 November 2002
Tuesday, 12 November 2002
- Re: comments on RDF MT
- Re: comments on RDF MT
- Re: Reflexivity of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (was: Re: comments on RDF MT)
- Re: RDF Test Cases WD for review
- Re: comments on RDF MT
Monday, 11 November 2002
- Re: Reflexivity of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (was: Re: comments on RDF MT)
- Re: Reflexivity of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (was: Re: comments on RDF MT)
- Re: Reflexivity of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (was: Re: comments on RDF MT)
- Re: Reflexivity of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (was: Re: comments on RDF MT)
- Re: Reflexivity of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (was: Re: comments on RDF MT)
- Reflexivity of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (was: Re: comments on RDF MT)
Friday, 8 November 2002
- comments on RDF MT
- Re: comments on current (6 Nov) draft of RDF MT document
- Re: comments on current (6 Nov) draft of RDF MT document
- Re: comments on current (6 Nov) draft of RDF MT document
Thursday, 7 November 2002
Wednesday, 6 November 2002
Sunday, 3 November 2002
Friday, 1 November 2002
- Re: comment on emptyPropertyElt
- Re: comment on emptyPropertyElt
- Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review
- comment on emptyPropertyElt
Thursday, 31 October 2002
- Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review
- a question on RDF-MT
- Re: single-ID constraint not clear [Fwd: Re: Guide: Legal syntax?]
- RDF Model and Syntax Specification
Wednesday, 30 October 2002
- Re: RDF should allow XML datatypes
- Re: rdf:Property X rdfs:Property
- Re: RDF should allow XML datatypes
- Re: single-ID constraint not clear [Fwd: Re: Guide: Legal syntax?]
- Re: RDF should allow XML datatypes
- Re: single-ID constraint not clear [Fwd: Re: Guide: Legal syntax?]
- rdf:Property X rdfs:Property
- Re: RDF should allow XML datatypes
- Re: RDF should allow XML datatypes
Wednesday, 23 October 2002
Tuesday, 29 October 2002
- single-ID constraint not clear [Fwd: Re: Guide: Legal syntax?]
- Re: RDF should allow XML datatypes
- RDF should allow XML datatypes
- defining RDF graph syntax
Monday, 28 October 2002
- Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review
- Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review
- Re: The first sentence
- Re: The first sentence
- Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review
- Re: The first sentence
- Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review
- Re: The first sentence
- Re: The first sentence
- Re: The first sentence
- Re: The first sentence
- The first sentence
Sunday, 27 October 2002
Friday, 25 October 2002
- Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft)
- Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft)
- Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft)
- Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft)
- Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft)
- Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft)
- Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft)
Thursday, 24 October 2002
- Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft)
- Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft)
- Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft)
Wednesday, 23 October 2002
- Re: RDF Concepts and formal inference paths ?
- Re: [xml-dev] Semantic web?
- RE: [xml-dev] Semantic web?
- Re: feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc
- Re: feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc
Tuesday, 22 October 2002
- Re: feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc
- Re: feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc
- Re: feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc
- Re: feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc
- Re: feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc
- feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc
Sunday, 20 October 2002
Friday, 18 October 2002
Wednesday, 16 October 2002
Tuesday, 15 October 2002
- unqualified RDF attributes in schema and syntax documents
- Re: RDF Issue rdfs-domain-unconstrained
- Re: Monotony
Monday, 14 October 2002
Sunday, 13 October 2002
Saturday, 12 October 2002
Friday, 11 October 2002
- Re: Monotony
- Re: rdf:nodeID addresses rdfms-syntax-incomplete
- rdf:nodeID addresses rdfms-syntax-incomplete
- Re: An implementation of proposal F
- Re: RDF typed node implementation experience
Thursday, 10 October 2002
- Re: RDF typed node implementation experience
- Re: RDF typed node implementation experience
- Re: Monotony
- Re: Monotony
- Re: Monotony
- Re: Monotony
- Monotony
- RDF typed node implementation experience