- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:02:04 -0500 (EST)
- To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
With the indicate change, the caveat would help to reduce the potential for problems. peter From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> Subject: Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 23:53:58 +0000 > Peter, > > I believe I have now understood your concerns on equality ... > > Would the following text near the beginning of the abstract syntax section > help (help enough to reduce it to a minor concern?) > [[ > Note: Syntactic equality, between RDF graphs, URI references or literals, > is *ALWAYS* inappropriate for applications. Semantic notions, defined in > [RDF-SEMANTICS], such as that of entailment between graphs, or that of > having the same denotation are to be used instead. > ]] > > Jeremy > > >
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2002 19:03:34 UTC