W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > October to December 2002

RE: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]

From: <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:39:47 -0500
Message-ID: <5C76D29CD0FA3143896D08BB1743296AB00340@bsebe001.americas.nokia.com>
To: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>

Hi Brian,

> From: ext Brian McBride [mailto:bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
> I'm not sure what you are looking for here Art.  The primer 
> is (we hope) 
> informative.  I think you can rely on the examples it provides.  We 
> certainly haven't put in any that we know to be wrong.

My point is that M&S defined 15-20 normative examples.  Whereas the 
Primer defines 0 normative examples; the Syntax examples in section 2 
are "informal".  I think normative examples are important (for copying,
referencing, etc.) so I don't see the current situation as a step 


Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2002 12:40:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:01 UTC