Tuesday, 30 December 2008
Monday, 29 December 2008
- Re: ZIP-based packages and URI references into them ODF proposal
- Re: Progress draft 1.27 - ready for last call?
- Re: Progress draft 1.27 - ready for last call?
- Progress draft 1.27 - ready for last call?
- Re: ISSUE-78: HTML5 stalled and suspend progress events [Progress Events]
- Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...
- Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...
Saturday, 27 December 2008
- Re: Use cases for Selectors-API
- Re: Use cases for Selectors-API
- Re: Use cases for Selectors-API
- Re: Use cases for Selectors-API
- Re: [DOM2 Range] bug in example to handle insertions
- Re: Use cases for Selectors-API
- [DOM2 Range] bug in example to handle insertions
Friday, 26 December 2008
- Re: Use cases for Selectors-API
- Use cases for Selectors-API
- Re: setRequestHeader underspecified - setting "Accept" header as an example
Thursday, 25 December 2008
Friday, 19 December 2008
Thursday, 18 December 2008
- [widgets] Minutes from 18 December 2008 Voice Conference
- RE: [widgets] Digital Signatures questions for discussion
- widgets signature abstract - proposed change
Wednesday, 17 December 2008
Tuesday, 16 December 2008
- Re: [widgets] Packaging & Configuration 1.0 pre-CfC comments
- Re: [widgets] Packaging & Configuration 1.0 pre-CfC comments
Sunday, 14 December 2008
Tuesday, 16 December 2008
- Re: ACTION-208: Security considerations concerning compression
- Re: [widgets] Agenda for 18 December 2008 voice conference
- [widgets] Agenda for 18 December 2008 voice conference
- ACTION-208: Security considerations concerning compression
- Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...
Monday, 15 December 2008
- [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...
- RE: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- Re: [widgets] Packaging & Configuration 1.0 pre-CfC comments
- Re: [widgets] Packaging & Configuration 1.0 pre-CfC comments
Sunday, 14 December 2008
Saturday, 13 December 2008
Friday, 12 December 2008
- Re: [widgets] Packaging & Configuration 1.0 pre-CfC comments
- Re: [XHR] blocking httpOnly cookies
- Re: [widgets] Packaging & Configuration 1.0 pre-CfC comments
- Re: [selectors-api] matchesSelector() Proposal
- Re: [selectors-api] matchesSelector() Proposal
- Re: [XMLHttpRequest]HttpOnly cookies visibility in XMLHttpRequest
Thursday, 11 December 2008
- [widgets] CfC to publish Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0 Packing and Config spec; Deadline for comments Dec 18
- Re: [XHR] Error flag
- Re: [widgets] Packaging & Configuration 1.0 pre-CfC comments
- Re: [XHR] Error flag
- RE: ZIP-based packages and URI references into them ODF proposal
Wednesday, 10 December 2008
- RE: ZIP-based packages and URI references into them ODF proposal
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Packaging & Configuration 1.0 pre-CfC comments
- Re: [XHR] Error flag
- Re: [XHR] Error flag
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [XMLHttpRequest]HttpOnly cookies visibility in XMLHttpRequest
- Re: [XMLHttpRequest]HttpOnly cookies visibility in XMLHttpRequest
- Re: [XHR2] progress events dispatch rate
- Re: [XMLHttpRequest]HttpOnly cookies visibility in XMLHttpRequest
- Re: [XHR] blocking httpOnly cookies
- [widgets] Packaging & Configuration 1.0 pre-CfC comments
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
Tuesday, 9 December 2008
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] Use case for passing invalid selector
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] Use case for passing invalid selector
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- [selectors-api] Use case for passing invalid selector (was: Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API)
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- RE: Wheel events
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
Monday, 8 December 2008
- Re: [selectors-api] Typo
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] Typo (was: SVG WG Review of Selectors API)
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [selectors-api] matchesSelector() Proposal (was: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call)
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
Sunday, 7 December 2008
- [XHR] Error flag
- Re: [widgets] Unicode Zip Paths (fully decomposed canonical form?)
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Unicode Zip Paths (fully decomposed canonical form?)
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- Re: [widgets] Typos
Saturday, 6 December 2008
- [widgets] Typos
- [widgets] Comments on reference
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- [widgets] the widget spec needs you! Volunteer to help with references
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- Re: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- Re: Wheel events
- Re: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- Re: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- Re: Wheel events
- Re: [widgets] Unicode Zip Paths (fully decomposed canonical form?)
- RE: Wheel events
- [widgets] Unicode Zip Paths (fully decomposed canonical form?)
Friday, 5 December 2008
- [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: Next steps on Widgets testing?
- [widgets] Discussion about widget: scheme by TAG
Thursday, 4 December 2008
- Re: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- Re: Next steps on Widgets testing?
- RE: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- [widgets] Minutes from 4 December 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: partial signing (Re: ACTION-163)
- partial signing (Re: ACTION-163)
- b. Action-233 "Research the Widget object's preference attribute to make sure it uses the correct type";
- ACTION-163
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Position Papers available for Security for Access to Device APIs from the Web
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- [widgets] Window modes
Wednesday, 3 December 2008
- Fwd: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Trimming attribute values, a bad idea?
- Re: [widgets] Trimming attribute values, a bad idea?
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- [widgets] URI attribute naming
- Re: [widgets] Trimming attribute values, a bad idea?
- Re: [widgets] Trimming attribute values, a bad idea?
- Re: [widgets] Digital Signatures questions for discussion
- Re: further with transfers (Re: Clipboard actions BOF table at W3C TPAC)
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Trimming attribute values, a bad idea?
- Re: [widgets] Trimming attribute values, a bad idea?
- Re: [widgets] Trimming attribute values, a bad idea?
- Re: [widgets] Trimming attribute values, a bad idea?
- new public-pkg-uri-scheme mailing list [was: ZIP-based packages and URI references within them, [widgets, uriBasedPackageAccess-61]]
- [widgets] Trimming attribute values, a bad idea?
- Re: Extended attributes in the grammar (was: Re: [WebIDL] Java package mapping)
- Extended attributes in the grammar (was: Re: [WebIDL] Java package mapping)
Tuesday, 2 December 2008
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: ZIP-based packages and URI references within them, [widgets, uriBasedPackageAccess-61]
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: ZIP-based packages and URI references within them, [widgets, uriBasedPackageAccess-61]
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- RE: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- Re: [XHR] IDL namespace
- Re: [XHR] IDL namespace
- [XHR] IDL namespace (was: [Selectors-API] IDL namespace)
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
Monday, 1 December 2008
- RE: ZIP-based packages and URI references into them ODF proposal
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- [widgets] Agenda for 4 December 2009 Voice Conference - NOTE NEW TIME!
- Re: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- Re: [WebIDL] Java package mapping
- Re: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- Re: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- Re: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- Re: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- Re: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- RE: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- RE: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- RE: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- Re: [WebIDL] Java package mapping
- Re: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- Re: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- Re: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- Re: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- RE: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- Re: [WebIDL] Java package mapping
Sunday, 30 November 2008
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
Saturday, 29 November 2008
- [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [WebIDL] Java package mapping
- RE: ZIP-based packages and URI references into them ODF proposal
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- Re: [WebIDL] Java package mapping
Friday, 28 November 2008
- RE: ZIP-based packages and URI references into them ODF proposal
- Re: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- Re: [WebIDL] Java package mapping (was: Re: [Selectors-API] IDL namespace)
- Re: [WebIDL] Java package mapping
- [WebIDL] Java package mapping (was: Re: [Selectors-API] IDL namespace)
- Re: CSS WG comments on Selectors API
- Re: [WebIDL] questions
Thursday, 27 November 2008
- Re: CSS WG comments on Selectors API
- CSS WG comments on Selectors API
- Re: XHR and AC4CSR Status [Was: [admin] Publishing moratorium for rest of 2008 - December 18 Deadline]
- Re: [WebIDL] questions
- Re: [WebIDL] questions
- Re: [WebIDL] questions
- Re: [WebIDL] questions
Wednesday, 26 November 2008
- [WebIDL] questions
- Re: Follow-up on widgets scheme discussion with TAG members [Was: Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again]
- Re: ZIP-based packages and URI references within them, [widgets, uriBasedPackageAccess-61]
- Re: ZIP-based packages and URI references within them, [widgets, uriBasedPackageAccess-61]
- Re: ZIP-based packages and URI references within them, [widgets, uriBasedPackageAccess-61]
- Re: Next steps on Widgets testing?
- Web DOM Core: createElement convenience method (fwd)
Tuesday, 25 November 2008
- Re: Next steps on Widgets testing?
- Re: [XHR2] progress events dispatch rate
- RE: ZIP-based packages and URI references within them, [widgets, uriBasedPackageAccess-61]
- Re: Next steps on Widgets testing?
- Next steps on Widgets testing?
- Could we add setCapture to DOM Events?
Monday, 24 November 2008
- Re: Widget testing
- Re: Widget testing
- Re: Widget testing
- Re: [XHR] security issue with spec's "same-origin" and the Document pointer
- New Progress draft 1.26
- Re: [Selectors-API] IDL namespace
- Re: [Selectors-API] IDL namespace
- Re: [Selectors-API] IDL namespace
- Re: ACTION-256 Send Widget URI scheme slides to one of {member,public}-webapps [Was: Fwd: Widget Addressing Timescales and Test Cases.]
- Re: [Selectors-API] IDL namespace
- Re: [XHR] security issue with spec's "same-origin" and the Document pointer
- Re: [Bindings] extended attribute for callback function interfaces?
- Re: [Bindings] extended attribute for callback function interfaces?
- Re: [Bindings] extended attribute for callback function interfaces?
- Re: [Bindings] extended attribute for callback function interfaces?
- Re: [Bindings] extended attribute for callback function interfaces?
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: Comments on some Web IDL extended attribute names
Sunday, 23 November 2008
- Re: [XHR] security issue with spec's "same-origin" and the Document pointer
- Re: [XHR] security issue with spec's "same-origin" and the Document pointer
- Fwd: Widget Addressing Timescales and Test Cases.
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0: Requirements LCWD
- Re: [widgets] Minutes from 30 October 2008 Voice Conference
- RE: [widgets] Minutes from 30 October 2008 Voice Conference
Saturday, 22 November 2008
Friday, 21 November 2008
- Re: [XHR] security issue with spec's "same-origin" and the Document pointer
- [XHR] security issue with spec's "same-origin" and the Document pointer
- Re: [Selectors-API] IDL namespace
- Re: [selectors-api] Liveness versus NodeList
- Re: [selectors-api] Liveness versus NodeList
- Re: [selectors-api] Names of querySelector() and querySelectorAll() methods
- Re: [selectors-api] Liveness versus NodeList
- Re: [selectors-api] Matching subtrees or not
- Re: [selectors-api] First element example
- Re: [selectors-api] Typo in Example
- Re: [selectors-api] Liveness versus NodeList
- Re: [widgets] Minutes from 30 October 2008 Voice Conference
- Re: Progress Events normative text
Thursday, 20 November 2008
Wednesday, 19 November 2008
- Re: [Selectors-API] IDL namespace
- Re: [selectors-api] Matching subtrees or not
- Re: [selectors-api] Names of querySelector() and querySelectorAll() methods
- Re: [selectors-api] Matching subtrees or not
- [Selectors-API] IDL namespace
- Re: [selectors-api] Names of querySelector() and querySelectorAll() methods
- [selectors-api] Names of querySelector() and querySelectorAll() methods
- [selectors-api] Matching subtrees or not
- Re: [selectors-api] Liveness versus NodeList
- [selectors-api] First element example
- [selectors-api] Liveness versus NodeList
- [selectors-api] Typo in Example
Tuesday, 18 November 2008
- Re: setRequestHeader underspecified - setting "Accept" header as an example
- Selectors API: New Last Call
- Re: setRequestHeader underspecified - setting "Accept" header as an example
- [widgets] Agenda for 20 November 2008 Voice Conference
- setRequestHeader underspecified - setting "Accept" header as an example
- Re: [WebIDL] Treatment of getters and setters
- [XHR2] abort event when calling abort()
Monday, 17 November 2008
- Re: [WebIDL] Treatment of getters and setters
- Re: [WebIDL] Treatment of getters and setters
- [WebIDL] Treatment of getters and setters
Sunday, 16 November 2008
Friday, 14 November 2008
- RE: [widgets] OMTP BONDI 2nd public working draft released
- [widgets] OMTP BONDI 2nd public working draft released
- [widgets] Digital Signatures questions for discussion
Thursday, 13 November 2008
- Re: Query about WebIDL extended attribute syntax
- [widgets] Minutes from 13 November 2008 Voice Conference
Wednesday, 12 November 2008
- Re: [widgets] Agenda for 13 November 2008 Voice Conference
- [widgets] Agenda for 13 November 2008 Voice Conference
- [WebIDL] Value of [[Class]] on host objects
Saturday, 8 November 2008
Friday, 7 November 2008
Thursday, 6 November 2008
- RE: [DOML3 Events] DOMCharacterDataModified frequency?
- Re: [DOML3 Events] DOMCharacterDataModified frequency?
- [DOML3 Events] DOMCharacterDataModified frequency?
Wednesday, 5 November 2008
Monday, 3 November 2008
- Re: ISSUE-22 (Is SHA1 good enough?): Is sha1 as a DigestMethod strong enough for Widgets digital signatures?
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0: Requirements LCWD
Saturday, 1 November 2008
- Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
Friday, 31 October 2008
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- Re: ISSUE-78: HTML5 stalled and suspend progress events [Progress Events]
- Re: ISSUE-78: HTML5 stalled and suspend progress events [Progress Events]
- Progress Events normative text
- Re: ISSUE-78: HTML5 stalled and suspend progress events [Progress Events]
- Re: ISSUE-78: HTML5 stalled and suspend progress events [Progress Events]
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- RE: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call
- Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...
- Re: ISSUE-78: HTML5 stalled and suspend progress events [Progress Events]
Thursday, 30 October 2008
Wednesday, 29 October 2008
- [widgets] Agenda for 30 October 2008 Voice Conference
- [selectors-api] All Issues Resolved
- Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature "Selectors API" belongs to?
- Fwd: Position paper deadline extended to 5 Nov. 08 ( Security for Access to Device APIs from the Web - W3C Workshop)
- Follow-up on widgets scheme discussion with TAG members [Was: Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again]
- Re: [selectors-api]
- Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API comments: section 2
- scrappy minutes drafts
Tuesday, 28 October 2008
- Re: [widgets] Version string
- Re: [widgets] Version string
- Re: [widgets] Version string
- Re: [widgets] Widget locale
Monday, 27 October 2008
- Re: [widgets] Version string
- Re: [widgets] Version string
- Re: FileUpload Spec | Editor's Draft | Re: Call for Consensus: a new WD of the File Upload spec
- Re: [widgets] Version string
- Re: [widgets] Version string
- [widgets] id attribute rename
- [widgets] Version string
Saturday, 25 October 2008
- ISSUE-78: HTML5 stalled and suspend progress events [Progress Events]
- Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...
- Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...
Friday, 24 October 2008
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...
- Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...
- Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...
Thursday, 23 October 2008
- Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...
- Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...
- [widgets] Widget locale
- Re: ISSUE-77 (XHR2+loadend): XMLHttpRequestEventTarget should have attribute EventListener onloadend [XHR2]
- Re: FileUpload Spec | Editor's Draft | Re: Call for Consensus: a new WD of the File Upload spec
- Re: ISSUE-77 (XHR2+loadend): XMLHttpRequestEventTarget should have attribute EventListener onloadend [XHR2]
- ISSUE-77 (XHR2+loadend): XMLHttpRequestEventTarget should have attribute EventListener onloadend [XHR2]
- Re: FileUpload Spec | Editor's Draft | Re: Call for Consensus: a new WD of the File Upload spec
- RE: further with transfers (Re: Clipboard actions BOF table at W3C TPAC)
- Re: further with transfers (Re: Clipboard actions BOF table at W3C TPAC)
- Re: further with transfers (Re: Clipboard actions BOF table at W3C TPAC)
- Re: further with transfers (Re: Clipboard actions BOF table at W3C TPAC)
Wednesday, 22 October 2008
- Re: WF2: application/x-www-form-urlencoded encoding ill-defined
- Re: Clipboard actions BOF table at W3C TPAC
- Re: DOM Events and disabled form controls
- Re: Clipboard actions BOF table at W3C TPAC
- Re: Clipboard actions BOF table at W3C TPAC
- Re: Clipboard actions BOF table at W3C TPAC
- Clipboard actions BOF table at W3C TPAC
- Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...
Tuesday, 21 October 2008
- [widgets] Minutes from 21 October f2f meeting
- [widgets] Minutes from 20 October 2008 f2f meeting
- Re: [access-control] Seeking Clarification and Status of Issues #25, #26, #29, #30, #31 and #32
- Re: ISSUE-38: DOM 3 Events abort/error bubble, ProgressEvent abort/error do not [Progress Events]
- New Progress draft (1.25)...
- Re: ISSUE-3 (eventType): [Progress] eventType [Progress events]
- Re: Transitioning to a new position!
- Re: ISSUE-37: [Progress] Use unsigned long long for .loaded and .total
- ISSUE-4 Re: New Progress Events draft
Monday, 20 October 2008
- [access-control] Allow example bug
- [access-control] Security Considerations
- Re: New Progress Events draft
- New Progress Events draft
- [access-control] Header definitions
- Re: [AC] "Origin: null" versus "Origin: "
- [XHR] blocking httpOnly cookies
- Re: [access-control] Update
- Re: [XHR] (Late) LC Comments
- Re: [XHR] (Late) LC Comments
- Re: [access-control] Update
- Re: [Progress Events] unsigned long long for .loaded and .total
- ISSUE-4 - what counts as content for transfer? [Progress Events]
- Re: [selectors-api] Why null as opposed to empty string (or either one) to resolve default namespace
- Member Submission - BITSY
- Re: [selectors-api] Return value of lookupNamespaceURI
- [widgets] URI scheme presentation
- Re: [selectors-api] Why does the default namespace have to be resolved?
- Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents
Saturday, 18 October 2008
Friday, 17 October 2008
- Re: FileUpload Spec | Editor's Draft | Re: Call for Consensus: a new WD of the File Upload spec
- OpenAjax Seeks feedback on their "Mobile Device APIs Style Guide"
- Re: Seamless online-offline applications
- Re: Seamless online-offline applications
- Re: FileUpload Spec | Editor's Draft | Re: Call for Consensus: a new WD of the File Upload spec
- Re: FileUpload Spec | Editor's Draft | Re: Call for Consensus: a new WD of the File Upload spec
- Re: FileUpload Spec | Editor's Draft | Re: Call for Consensus: a new WD of the File Upload spec
- Re: FileUpload Spec | Editor's Draft | Re: Call for Consensus: a new WD of the File Upload spec
- Re: FileUpload Spec | Editor's Draft | Re: Call for Consensus: a new WD of the File Upload spec
- Re: FileUpload Spec | Editor's Draft | Re: Call for Consensus: a new WD of the File Upload spec
- Re: FileUpload Spec | Editor's Draft | Re: Call for Consensus: a new WD of the File Upload spec
Thursday, 16 October 2008
- Re: [access-control] Seeking Clarification and Status of Issues #25, #26, #29, #30, #31 and #32
- [widgets] October 16 Meeting is CANCELED! [Was: Re: [widgets] Agenda for 16 October 2008 Voice Conference]
- [XHR2] progress events dispatch rate
- Re: Seamless online-offline applications
- Re: FileUpload Spec | Editor's Draft | Re: Call for Consensus: a new WD of the File Upload spec
- Re: FileUpload Spec | Editor's Draft | Re: Call for Consensus: a new WD of the File Upload spec
- Re: FileUpload Spec | Editor's Draft | Re: Call for Consensus: a new WD of the File Upload spec
Wednesday, 15 October 2008
- FileUpload Spec | Editor's Draft | Re: Call for Consensus: a new WD of the File Upload spec
- Cancelled: DOM3 Events Telcon
- Seamless online-offline applications
- [widgets] Agenda for 16 October 2008 Voice Conference
- Re: Widget Requirements feedback
- RE: Widget Requirements feedback
Tuesday, 14 October 2008
- Re: [widgets] Updates FPWD published
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- RE: [widgets] Updates FPWD published
Monday, 13 October 2008
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
Saturday, 11 October 2008
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- Transitioning to a new position!
Friday, 10 October 2008
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- Re: [access-control] Seeking Clarification and Status of Issues #25, #26, #29, #30, #31 and #32
- Re: [widgets] Updates FPWD published
- [widgets] finding multiple signatures
- Re: [widgets] Updates FPWD published
- Re: [widgets] Updates FPWD published
- Re: [access-control] Seeking Clarification and Status of Issues #25, #26, #29, #30, #31 and #32
Thursday, 9 October 2008
- [widgets] Updates FPWD published
- [access-control] Seeking Clarification and Status of Issues #25, #26, #29, #30, #31 and #32
- [access-control] Is Issue#24 (Which headers should be allowed in the Allow List?) Addressed?
- [access-control] Proposal to Close Issue#12 - IIS and Access-Control-Policy-Path
- [access-control] Proposal to Close Issue#14 - Opting into methods/headers
- [access-control] Proposal to Close Issue#11 - What is the Security Model for the access-control spec?
- [access-control] Proposal to Close Issue#10 - Client and Server model
- [widgets] Minutes from 9 October 2008 Voice Conference
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- [Widgets] BONDI update from Austin
- Re: [access-control] "Origin: null" versus "Origin: "
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- [AC] "Origin: null" versus "Origin: "
- Re: [widgets] i18n <span> element VS unicode RLM/LRM
Wednesday, 8 October 2008
- Re: [widgets] i18n <span> element VS unicode RLM/LRM
- Re: [widgets] i18n <span> element VS unicode RLM/LRM
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- Reminder: No DOM3 Events Telcon Today
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- Re: [access-control] registering headers
- Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- Re: [access-control] registering headers
- Re: [access-control] registering headers
- [widgets] Feature Access Declarations requirement
- [access-control] registering headers
- [widgets] Agenda for 9 October 2008 Voice Conference
Tuesday, 7 October 2008
- [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again
- Re: [XHR2]
- [XHR2]
- Re: Call for Consensus: a new WD of the File Upload spec
Monday, 6 October 2008
- Re: [AC] Defining cookieless requests
- Re: [access-control] Implementation comments (credentials flag)
- Re: [XHR2] Drop ByteArray?
- Re: [access-control] non same-origin to same-origin redirect
- Re: [XHR2] Drop ByteArray?
- Re: [access-control] Allowing HEAD
- Re: [XHR2] Drop ByteArray?
- [access-control] Allowing HEAD
- Re: [access-control] non same-origin to same-origin redirect
- Re: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin header syntax
- [XHR2] Drop ByteArray?
- [XHR2] XMLHttpRequest Level 2 WD Published
- Re: Proposal: High resolution (and otherwise improved) timer API
Sunday, 5 October 2008
Friday, 3 October 2008
- Re: [webkit-dev] Proposed Timer API
- Re: Proposal: High resolution (and otherwise improved) timer API
- Re: Proposal: High resolution (and otherwise improved) timer API
- Re: Proposal: High resolution (and otherwise improved) timer API
- Re: Proposal: High resolution (and otherwise improved) timer API
- Re: [webkit-dev] Proposed Timer API
- Re: Proposal: High resolution (and otherwise improved) timer API
- Re: Proposal: High resolution (and otherwise improved) timer API
- Re: Proposal: High resolution (and otherwise improved) timer API
- Re: [webkit-dev] Proposed Timer API
- Re: Proposal: High resolution (and otherwise improved) timer API
- Re: [AC] Defining cookieless requests
- RE: Proposal: High resolution (and otherwise improved) timer API
- Re: [AC] Defining cookieless requests
- Re: Comments on some Web IDL extended attribute names
- Re: Proposal: High resolution (and otherwise improved) timer API
- [access-control] non same-origin to same-origin redirect
- Re: Proposal: High resolution (and otherwise improved) timer API
- Re: Comments on some Web IDL extended attribute names
- Re: Proposal: High resolution (and otherwise improved) timer API
- Re: Proposal: High resolution (and otherwise improved) timer API
- Re: Proposal: High resolution (and otherwise improved) timer API
- Re: Proposal: High resolution (and otherwise improved) timer API
- Proposal: High resolution (and otherwise improved) timer API
- Comments on some Web IDL extended attribute names