- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:59:09 +0200
- To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org Group WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 05:43:55 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > - Perhaps the argument order should be (handler, delay, repeating) > instead, to be more like setTimeout / setInterval > > - Perhaps the "repeating" or even the "delayInSeconds" arguments should > be optional, defaulting to false and 0 respectively, and possibly in > combination with the above suggestion. I think that would be nice. I was wondering why startTimer returns a Timer object. What is the use case for that? -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 11:59:52 UTC