- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:35:44 -0400
- To: "Marcos Caceres" <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok. I will add "Any hierarchical URI scheme" as the proposed solution > into the spec. > > I will say that, personally, I feel it is irresponsible for the > WebApps WG to not recommend a complete and a secure solution for this > issue. I also fear that not mandating a URI scheme will lead to > interoperability issues (especially going forward into V2, where we > might want to support things like queries and fragments, which > something like file: does not support). Well, the questions I asked of you were intended to discover whether or not interoperability was impacted by not specifying a URI scheme. Is there some aspect of this I didn't consider? Can you give me an example of an interoperability (or security, as you say) problem that's created by not specifying a URI scheme? Mark.
Received on Friday, 10 October 2008 19:36:24 UTC