- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 15:05:37 +1100
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
Charles McCathieNevile:
> So this is a call for Consensus to publish the Editor's Draft [1] of the
> Selectors API spec as a Last Call. Please respond before Monday November
> 10. As always, silence is taken as assent but an explicit response is
> preferred.
I’m in favour of publishing.
A few comments though (since this consensus call prompted me to look at
it), mostly editorial, before the LC period begins:
* In the first sentence of section 6, I’d do /either/any of/, since there
are more than two interfaces listed.
* There’s a newer Web IDL WD available than the one referenced (with
the new name) so it might be good to reference that. Then you can
use [WEBIDL] as the reference link text instead.
* In section 6, I don’t think it’s necessary to explicitly mention
undefined, since it’s already handled by the annotation in the IDL.
If you do want to include this in the prose, I think it needs to be
qualified to say that this applies to an ECMAScript language binding
of the interface. (null’s OK, since you can talk about null at the
level of IDL values so it’s applicable to any language.)
* s/an an asterisk/an asterisk/ in section 6.1.
Thanks,
Cameorn
--
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Saturday, 1 November 2008 04:06:21 UTC