- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:42:42 -0500
- To: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Marcos Caceres wrote: > Ok, hearing no objections, then I propose we bake in the following > file extensions into the spec (we can debate which MIME types to use > after we settle on the extensions!): ... > .css That extension is used for both the text/css and application/x-pointplus MIME types. In fact it's mapped to the latter by default in some web servers. Then again, this is likely to be a common problem with any extension-sniffing approach. -Boris
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2008 17:43:29 UTC