- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:05:08 -0800
- To: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Marcos Caceres wrote: > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >> Marcos Caceres wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >>>> Marcos Caceres wrote: >>>>> Ok, hearing no objections, then I propose we bake in the following >>>>> file extensions into the spec (we can debate which MIME types to use >>>>> after we settle on the extensions!): >>>>> >>>>> .html >>>>> .htm >>>>> .css >>>>> .gif >>>>> .jpeg >>>>> .png >>>>> .js >>>>> .json >>>>> .xml >>>>> .txt >>>>> >>>>> The following we should probably bake in too: >>>>> .mp3 >>>>> .swf >>>>> .wav >>>>> .svg >>>>> .ico >>>> I'm not a big fan of "endorsing" mp3 given that it's a patented format >>>> that >>>> can't be implemented by FOSS software. >>>> >>>> / Jonas >>>> >>> Ok, no MP3. maybe you can suggest some other suitable audio format? >> I'd stick with wav for now. Possibly also FLAC. > > Ok, sounds good. I suppose flac has a .flac extension? (sorry, apart > from mp3 and wav, I don't know audio formats at all!) I'm mostly in the same boat :) But it does look like .flac is the preferred extension. / Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2008 01:04:05 UTC