- From: Kai Hendry <hendry@aplix.co.jp>
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 13:16:26 +0000
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
Hey guys, I have an action to tell you what I've been upto WRT widgets http://www.w3.org/2008/11/04-mwts-minutes.html#action02 I've started working one day a week on widget testing. My own git repo is here: http://git.webvm.net/?p=wgtqa and it will move to a W3C CVS soon. I've come across a couple of issues which I've mailed Marcos already about. Though I'll paste them in here just in case: Subject: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-license Having a optional URI or href whatever for the license would be good. Seems to be some inconsistency between src, uri, url, href btw that you can easily pick up in the relaxng scheme. http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-author xml:lang is not needed and it's not in your relaxng schema besides. Subject: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-widget0 Bit confused by its:dir on widget, name, description, author etc. The RelaxNG compact schema uses the bdo element and so does HTML5 so can't we just rock with that? http://git.webvm.net/?p=wgtqa;a=blob;f=widget.rnc I've also written a little widget validation tool, which uses my updated (probably wrong) schema (widget.rnc). Try foo.wgt out like so: curl -F "zip=@foo.wgt" http://wgt.webvm.net/ If you have any comments or you'd like to help us out over at http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/Tests/ then please get in touch. I'm also on IRC as 'hendry'. Enjoy the weekend,
Received on Friday, 7 November 2008 13:17:10 UTC