- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:01:43 +0200
- To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Web Applications Working Group WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:38:45 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > I do remember that we talked about it that way, and also talked about > having the default action of the loadend event be to fire the > appropriate abort/error/load event. > > However I'm not sure why that way is better? I.e. why would you want to > prevent abort/error/load from firing? > > I do like the symmetry in the current proposal where loadstart is the > first thing that fires, and loadend is the last thing. Seems very > intuitive. I agree that dispatching loadend last makes sense. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2008 14:02:37 UTC