Re: Progress draft 1.27 - ready for last call?

On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:33:35 +1100, Kartikaya Gupta  
<lists.webapps@stakface.com> wrote:

>
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:30:42 +1100, "Charles McCathieNevile"  
> <chaals@opera.com> wrote:
>>
>> Please review and send brickbats, comments, etc. ...
> 1. s/are not be/are not/
>
> 2. Section 2.2, second-last bullet point has an uppercase 'O' in  
> "Operation" for no apparent reason.
>
> 3. The description for the "totalArg" parameter of initProgressEvent  
> says "... the value of this parameter is not a non-negative number ...".  
> Why not just say "... the value of this parameter is a negative number  
> ..."? (redundant double negative removal).
>
> 4. s/prooress/progress/
>
> 5. Example 1 in section 3 seems to have been truncated.
>
> 6. There's a reference to HTML5 in example 3 but it's not hyperlinked to  
> anything.
>
> 7. Example 3 has two worky(evt) functions defined. I think one of those  
> was meant to be whatForYouDoThat(evt).
>
> 8. Shouldn't the child[1] in example 3 be child[0]?

All agreed and fixed. I'll put out another version in a few days that  
includes all these changes.

cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com

Received on Monday, 29 December 2008 06:24:51 UTC