Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API

On Dec 8, 2008, at 17:26 , Lachlan Hunt wrote:
 >Since NSResolver was taken out, please consider adding hardcoded  
>> prefixes for svg and xhtml similar to how the empty and any  
>> namespaces are
>> handled by this draft.
> Similar functionality was previously requested and rejected for the  
> xml and xmlns prefixes, and I see no reason to treat the xhtml and  
> svg prefixes any differently.

That's a shame, they should be defined for a DOM that supports XML  
features, especially the xml namespace.

>> Or alternatively forward the reader to DOM 3 XPath for the cases  
>> where the
>> Selectors API falls short.
> Please explain how providing a reference to DOM 3 XPath would be of  
> any benefit?  How would it help readers in their understanding of  
> this spec?

DOM 3 XPath solves pretty much the same problem but is more powerful,  
providing a reference to it will be very useful to people who want to  
select nodes from a DOM but bump into limitations of the Selector API.  
It changes nothing to normative requirements, but makes the spec more  
considerate towards its users, and a wee bit more useful.

Robin Berjon -
     Feel like hiring me? Go to

Received on Monday, 8 December 2008 17:58:37 UTC