Re: ACTION-256 Send Widget URI scheme slides to one of {member,public}-webapps [Was: Fwd: Widget Addressing Timescales and Test Cases.]

Pleas find attached the slides for the TPAC presentation on potential
widget URI schemes. Please note that these slides are not suitable for
printing.

Kind regards,
Marcos

On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
> Marcos - please send the URI of the Widget URI scheme presentation you made
> on October 20 to public-webapps:
>  <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/265>
> For the record, the version you identify should be the same version you
> displayed that day.
> All - Moving forward, it may make sense to continue to flesh out the details
> document. WDYT?
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Resent-From: public-webapps@w3.org
> From: "ext Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
> Date: November 23, 2008 9:00:59 AM EST
> To: Stuart Williams <skw@hp.com>
> Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, tag@w3.org
> Subject: Fwd: Widget Addressing Timescales and Test Cases.
> Stuart, All,
> Given the group's last discussion on this subject [1], my expectation is we
> will continue to focus on our use case [as chartered] and our general plan
> remains the same as we discussed with TAG members on October 21 [2].  See
> [3] for a thread we had regarding that October 21 discussion.
> Regarding notifying the TAG when related test cases are available, I created
> an Action for that request [4] and will notify you when those test cases are
> available.
> -Regards, Art Barstow
> [1] <http://www.w3.org/2008/10/30-wam-minutes.html#item03>
> [2] <http://www.w3.org/2008/10/20-wam-minutes.html#item12>
> [3]
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008OctDec/0197.html>
> [4] <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/282>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: "ext Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>
> Date: November 21, 2008 9:57:08 AM EST
> To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
> Cc: "tag@w3.org" <tag@w3.org>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
> Subject: Widget Addressing Timescales and Test Cases.
> Art,
> [cc'd to www-archive@w3.org to enable public reference]
> I picked up an action [1] item from yesterdays TAG telcon to respond that
> the TAG does not believe that it has the capacity to solve the widget
> addressing problem within a 3 month timeframe as mentioned/discussed when
> members of the TAG met with your WG [2].
> I think it would also be true to say (as I believe we aready have) that the
> TAG is more interested in general solution to the problems of refering into
> packaging structures (and maybe runtime 'objects' instantiated from such
> structures) as opposed to addressing a solution targetted soley on
> requirements for widget packaging/referencing.
> I don't know quite what 'balls' this leaves in what 'courts' right now - it
> would be good to check expectations all round.
> The TAG also asks that that you notify us when relevant test cases for URI
> based widget referencing become available.
> Thanks
> Stuart Williams
> (for W3C TAG)
> --
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/196
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2008/10/20-wam-minutes.html#item12
> AB: where do we do follow up? www-tag?
> DanC: yes
> ... what's the time scale?
> MC: we want to finish this within 3 months.
> DanC: are there any test cases for this?
> MC: no
> ... we're starting an implementation now
> Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12
> 1HN
> Registered No: 690597 England
> [Tracker: this is TAG ACTION-196]
>
>



-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au