- Re: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility Ian Hickson (Monday, 21 July)
- Re: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility Doug Schepers (Tuesday, 22 July)
- Re: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 22 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Sam Ruby (Tuesday, 29 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Henri Sivonen (Tuesday, 29 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 29 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Sam Ruby (Tuesday, 29 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Henri Sivonen (Tuesday, 29 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Sam Ruby (Tuesday, 29 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 29 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Sam Ruby (Tuesday, 29 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 30 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 30 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 30 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Sam Ruby (Wednesday, 30 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 30 July)
- RE: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Justin James (Wednesday, 30 July)
- RE: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 30 July)
- RE: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Justin James (Thursday, 31 July)
- Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson (Thursday, 31 July)
- Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Sam Ruby (Thursday, 31 July)
- Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson (Thursday, 31 July)
- Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke (Thursday, 31 July)
- Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson (Thursday, 31 July)
- Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke (Thursday, 31 July)
- Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson (Thursday, 31 July)
- Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Sam Ruby (Thursday, 31 July)
- Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson (Thursday, 31 July)
- Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Sam Ruby (Thursday, 31 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Sam Ruby (Wednesday, 30 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 30 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Henri Sivonen (Tuesday, 29 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Charles McCathieNevile (Wednesday, 30 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal is also ISSUE-37 (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Charles McCathieNevile (Wednesday, 30 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 30 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Doug Schepers (Wednesday, 30 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (ISSUE-41, ISSUE-37) Henri Sivonen (Wednesday, 30 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (ISSUE-41, ISSUE-37) Henri Sivonen (Wednesday, 30 July)
- Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (ISSUE-41, ISSUE-37) Philip Taylor (Wednesday, 30 July)
Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Jeff Schiller (Wednesday, 30 July)
Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) Jeff Schiller (Wednesday, 30 July)
- Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart Charles McCathieNevile (Sunday, 20 July)
- Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart Julian Reschke (Sunday, 20 July)
- Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart Karl Dubost (Sunday, 20 July)
- Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart Dean Edridge (Sunday, 20 July)
- Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart Dean Edridge (Sunday, 20 July)
- Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart Lachlan Hunt (Monday, 21 July)
- Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) Henri Sivonen (Wednesday, 23 July)
- Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) Philip Taylor (Webmaster) (Wednesday, 23 July)
- Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) Patrick Garies (Thursday, 24 July)
- Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) (Thursday, 24 July)
- Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) Robert J Burns (Wednesday, 23 July)
- Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) Smylers (Wednesday, 23 July)
Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart Henri Sivonen (Tuesday, 22 July)
Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart Robert J Burns (Tuesday, 22 July)
Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart Henri Sivonen (Tuesday, 22 July)
Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart Robert J Burns (Monday, 21 July)
Workers Ian Hickson (Thursday, 10 July)
Re: Workers Andrew Fedoniouk (Friday, 18 July)
- Re: Workers Ian Hickson (Friday, 18 July)
- Re: Workers Andrew Fedoniouk (Saturday, 19 July)
- Re: Workers Ian Hickson (Saturday, 19 July)
- Re: Workers Andrew Fedoniouk (Saturday, 19 July)
- Re: Workers Ian Hickson (Sunday, 20 July)
- Re: Workers Andrew Fedoniouk (Sunday, 20 July)
- Re: Workers Ian Hickson (Sunday, 20 July)
- Re: Workers Andrew Fedoniouk (Sunday, 20 July)
- Re: Workers Ian Hickson (Sunday, 20 July)
- Re: Workers Andrew Fedoniouk (Sunday, 20 July)
- Re: Workers Ian Hickson (Sunday, 20 July)
- Re: Workers Andrew Fedoniouk (Sunday, 20 July)
- Re: Workers James Graham (Sunday, 20 July)
- Re: Workers Andrew Fedoniouk (Sunday, 20 July)
- Re: Workers Ian Hickson (Sunday, 20 July)
- Re: Workers Andrew Fedoniouk (Sunday, 20 July)
- Re: Workers Ian Hickson (Monday, 21 July)
Re: Workers Jonas Sicking (Friday, 25 July)
example with source code Dailey, David P. (Monday, 14 July)
RE: Workers Justin James (Tuesday, 22 July)
Web sockets: typo Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 9 July)
- Re: websocket HTTP response parsing Ian Hickson (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: websocket HTTP response parsing Julian Reschke (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: websocket HTTP response parsing Ian Hickson (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: websocket HTTP response parsing Julian Reschke (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: websocket HTTP response parsing Ian Hickson (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: websocket HTTP response parsing Julian Reschke (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: websocket HTTP response parsing Ian Hickson (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: websocket HTTP response parsing Julian Reschke (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: websocket HTTP response parsing Ian Hickson (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: websocket HTTP response parsing Julian Reschke (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: websocket HTTP response parsing Ian Hickson (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: websocket HTTP response parsing Julian Reschke (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: websocket HTTP response parsing Ian Hickson (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: websocket HTTP response parsing Julian Reschke (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: websocket HTTP response parsing Ian Hickson (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: websocket HTTP response parsing Julian Reschke (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: websocket HTTP response parsing Ian Hickson (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: websocket HTTP response parsing Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 8 July)
RE: websocket HTTP response parsing Justin James (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 2 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter William A. Rowe, Jr. (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Julian Reschke (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Julian Reschke (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Julian Reschke (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Dave Singer (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Julian Reschke (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Dave Singer (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Julian Reschke (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter William A. Rowe, Jr. (Thursday, 3 July)
- Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Ian Hickson (Saturday, 5 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Saturday, 5 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Sam Ruby (Saturday, 5 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Boris Zbarsky (Saturday, 5 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Ian Hickson (Saturday, 5 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Sam Ruby (Saturday, 5 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Ian Hickson (Saturday, 5 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Sam Ruby (Saturday, 5 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Ian Hickson (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Sam Ruby (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Ian Hickson (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Ian Hickson (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Sam Ruby (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Ian Hickson (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Boris Zbarsky (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Boris Zbarsky (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 7 July)
- RE: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Justin James (Monday, 7 July)
- URI/IRI vs HTML-URL, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: URI/IRI vs HTML-URL, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Martin Duerst (Tuesday, 8 July)
- Re: URI/IRI vs HTML-URL, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 8 July)
- Re: URI/IRI vs HTML-URL, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Robert J Burns (Tuesday, 8 July)
- RE: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 7 July)
- RE: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Justin James (Monday, 7 July)
- RE: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 7 July)
- the "HTML URL" issue, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 8 July)
- Re: the "HTML URL" issue, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Stefan Eissing (Tuesday, 8 July)
- RE: the "HTML URL" issue, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Justin James (Tuesday, 8 July)
- Re: the "HTML URL" issue, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Stefan Eissing (Tuesday, 8 July)
- Re: the "HTML URL" issue Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 8 July)
- Re: the "HTML URL" issue, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 8 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Geoffrey Sneddon (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Leif Halvard Silli (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Sam Ruby (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Dave Singer (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Dave Singer (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Dave Singer (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Philip Taylor (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Karl Dubost (Tuesday, 8 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Robert J Burns (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Ian Hickson (Monday, 7 July)
- any error-free web pages at all? [was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea] Dan Connolly (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: any error-free web pages at all? [was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea] Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: any error-free web pages at all? [was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea] T.V Raman (Tuesday, 8 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 8 July)
- RE: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Chris Wilson (Tuesday, 8 July)
Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 3 July)
RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Justin James (Thursday, 3 July)
- RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Daniel Stenberg (Thursday, 3 July)
- RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Justin James (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Karl Dubost (Friday, 4 July)
- RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Justin James (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter William A. Rowe, Jr. (Friday, 4 July)
- RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Justin James (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter William A. Rowe, Jr. (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Adam Barth (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Karl Dubost (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Adam Barth (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Julian Reschke (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Adam Barth (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Julian Reschke (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Dave Singer (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Boris Zbarsky (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Michael A. Puls II (Friday, 4 July)
- RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Eric Lawrence (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Patrick Garies (Friday, 4 July)
RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Justin James (Friday, 4 July)
Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 3 July)
Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter William A. Rowe, Jr. (Thursday, 3 July)
RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Sam Ruby (Thursday, 3 July)
Last message date: Thursday, 31 July 2008 23:56:46 UTC