- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:37:16 +0200
- To: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
- CC: Smylers <Smylers@stripey.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Chris Wilson wrote: > ... >>> I think it's a poor language that doesn't think about its own >>> extensibility, >> XML obviously does extensibility. All HTML features are available in an >> XML language, XHTML. Why do we need for HTML to be arbitrarily >> extensible with any vocabulary, when we already have XHTML which does >> that? > > Because I don't think we really have XHTML. Or maybe I'm misreading interest in strict XML implementations of HTML5. > ... There is certainly a large group of people over here who dislike XML in principle. I guess the others are eagerly waiting for the moment when they can serve XHTML (as XML!) to all major browsers :-). BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2008 06:38:01 UTC