- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:27:03 +0200
- To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
- CC: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Ian Hickson wrote: > ... > On Sun, 7 May 2006, Simon Pieters wrote: >>> I think for <img> you want to only support image/* types (e.g. not >>> text/plain or text/html, not sure about image/svg+xml either, since >>> there is no difference between that and application/xhtml+xml); and >>> you want to only show them for 200 (or 301-200). >>> [...] >>> For <embed> you want to show only things that require plugins, and >>> only if they have 200 (or 301-200) responses. >> The only browser to my knowledge that only support 200 (or 301-200) >> responses for <img> and <embed> is IE5/Mac. Safari, Opera, Mozilla and >> IE all load the resourse for <img> and <embed> regardless of the >> response. (In the real world it works fine because error responses are >> normally text/html.) > > This is now what <img> and <embed> say. > ... That doesn't sound good. Is there any research on for how much of the consisting content this is needed? BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2008 08:27:49 UTC