- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:14:04 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Jeff Schiller wrote: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/#the-img has an issue highlighted: "Should > we restrict the URI to pointing to an image? What's an image? Is PDF an > image? (Safari supports PDFs in <img> elements.) How about SVG? (Opera > supports those). WMFs? XPMs? HTML?" > > My belief is that we should not restrict the URI or specify the format. So should UAs support text/plain and text/html resources in <img> elements? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2008 02:14:40 UTC