- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:46:40 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Julian Reschke wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > > > > Prefixes as an indirection syntax being a fundamentally bad design is > > something that has been assumed as a fundamental design decision for years. > > Unless new evidence has come up suggesting that this decision is flawed, > > reopening the issue is not a good use of our time. > > Again: I'd like to point out that "has been assumed as bad design" is > your opinion, not something this Working Group ever has reached > consensus on. Yes, I believe I said as much in the first of my e-mails on the topic yesterday: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Jul/0352.html ...as well as in my follow-up e-mail: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Jul/0354.html ...which itself links to four further e-mails clarifying the process that I am following here. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2008 07:47:17 UTC