- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:06:56 +0200
- To: "Michael A. Puls II" <shadow2531@gmail.com>
- CC: Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>, public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>
Michael A. Puls II wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com> wrote: >> Why not instead say explicitly the following? >> >> "XML serialized HTML5 Documents may omit the doctype. When including a >> doctype, authors must use "<!DOCTYPE html>" (just like the text/html >> serialization)." > > That makes perfect sense to me. It's making it clear that such XML > documents may contain <!DOCTYPE html>. That sounds a lot better than > "a DOCTYPE", which could mean any doctype. Hm. So are you saying that they can't use any doctype? BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2008 11:07:42 UTC