- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 09:30:07 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, David Morris wrote: >> Having invalid content of other forms noted as well would enable better >> overall quality. > > This isn't a particularly new idea; the main problem with it is that the > indicator would basically be always showing. Some _conservative_ estimates > put the number of pages with *syntax errors alone* in the 90% range. If > you add things like Content-Type errors, other HTTP problems, attribute > value errors, CSS errors, scripting errors, etc, the number is likely so > close to 100% that frankly the user will just wonder why his browser is > sad all the time. (It would be interesting to see if anyone could actually > find a Web page with more than 10kb of total content that is not in any > way affiliated with the person who found it and that had absolutely no > errors of any kind. I'm not convinced there are any.) The important point here is that the *page developers* should be able to detect the errors. BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2008 07:30:54 UTC