Yes. I would also argue that all editorial drafts are in the open and
nobody is excluded from reviewing and commenting on wai-xtech.
Rich
Rich Schwerdtfeger
Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer
"Sam Kuper"
<sam.kuper@uclmai
l.net> To
Sent by: Richard
sampablokuper@goo Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS,
glemail.com "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Al
Gilman" <Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org>,
"HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>,
07/24/08 05:50 AM public-pfwg-comments@w3.org,
public-pfwg-comments-request@w3.org
, wai-liaison@w3.org
cc
Subject
Re: linking work on processing
WAI-ARIA markup in HTML
Dear all,
I doubt I'm the only one who sees the chicken and egg problem expressed in
the comments below.
One or both parties will have to compromise, or ARIA-HTML5 integration just
won't happen.
Sam
2008/7/24 Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>:
> I don't see how we can fully state how we work with HTML 5 as it is not
done. We should be able to do this in a future version.
2008/7/23 Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>:
> 1. ARIA isn't being developed in the open. It is unlikely that we would
adopt wholesale anything that wasn't developed in a completely open
manner, with open public participation and a completely public feedback
loop.
