I may be out of my league here or missing something, but the SVG nodes implement the SVGElement interface (http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/idl.html) which extends the DOM2 Element interface ( http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Core/idl-definitions.html). Regards, Jeff On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com> wrote: > Of what type are the nodes? > > > > *From:* Jeff Schiller [mailto:codedread@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 23, 2008 4:44 PM > *To:* Chris Wilson > *Cc:* Henri Sivonen; HTML WG; www-svg > *Subject:* Re: ISSUE-37: RE: SVG in HTML proposal > > > > Chris, > > Can you clarify what you mean, exactly? > > My understanding is that the DOM should be no different than it is in > SVG-in-XHTML. That is: > > <html ...><body> > <svg id='svg1'...>... </svg> > </body></html> > > DOM node 'svg1' has a parent node of the HTML:body node, regardless of the > serialization. The namespace of the SVG nodes in the DOM are in the SVG > namespace, etc. > > Regards, > Jeff > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > > Without taking a strong stand one way or another on the XML-parser-in-HTML > question, I would like to raise the issue I brought up in last week's > telecon: how the DOM works across these "embeddings" is a critical question > for any of these proposals, and detail on this issue is absent from the SVG > WG proposal. > > -Chris Wilson > > >
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2008 23:56:16 UTC