- From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 16:10:34 +0200
- To: Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>
- Cc: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "'Henrik Nordstrom'" <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, "'HTTP Working Group'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, <public-html@w3.org>
Am 08.07.2008 um 15:55 schrieb Justin James: > Having nearly identical concepts is the root of this problem, not > the nearly > identical names (although that does not help either). There is no > need to > have a different spec for URI, IRI, and "HTTP URL", "URL > reference", "HREF" > (or whatever this mystery spec is being called). There should be > *one* spec > for resource locations. Period. The spec for URIs needs to define what URIs are and what not. It should *not* define how everything written on the side of a bus should be converted into a proper URI, nor what should happen to the bus if this does not work. //Stefan -- <green/>bytes GmbH, Hafenweg 16, D-48155 Münster, Germany Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782
Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2008 14:11:18 UTC