- From: Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:00:32 -0400
- To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "'Anne van Kesteren'" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "'Mark Nottingham'" <mnot@mnot.net>, "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>
Agreed. Anything that HTML does that follows the lines of a more "meta" protocol such as HTTP should be a pure wrapper around that protocol, not an imitation or a fork. That is why I reject the current implementation of redirection with meta tags, for example. J.Ja -----Original Message----- From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Julian Reschke Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 12:55 PM To: Anne van Kesteren Cc: Mark Nottingham; HTML WG Subject: who owns link relations, was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02 Anne van Kesteren wrote: > ... > Also, it seems better if the Link HTTP header just defers its semantics > to HTML. > ... Absolutely not. Link relations are used outside the scope of HTML (see Atom, for instance), so it would be a bad idea to define them inside HTML. BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2008 17:01:53 UTC