- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:11:57 -0500
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, wai-liaison@w3.org, public-pfwg-comments@w3.org
We talked about this in our 24 July teleconference; sorry for the delay.. On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 20:52 +0000, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Al Gilman wrote: > > > > I see by your Tracker that you have an ISSUE-35 on "aria processing." > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/35 > > There are three issues blocking the adoption of ARIA proposals in HTML5: > > 1. ARIA isn't being developed in the open. It is unlikely that we would > adopt wholesale anything that wasn't developed in a completely open > manner, with open public participation and a completely public > feedback loop. I mentioned this in: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg-comments/2008AprJun/0004.html I think we've gotten far enough on the openness point, but the other two remain... it seems important for ARIA to say more about how it works with HTML... > 2. ARIA specifications lack clear normative conformance criteria. I gave > a bunch of examples of this in: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg-comments/2008JanMar/0102.html > > 3. ARIA doesn't define how ARIA works in conjunction with existing > features in HTML4, HTML5, and other specs. For example, if the HTML5 > "required" attribute indicates that a form control is required when > the ARIA required attributes indicates that it is not. This was the > second problem listed in: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg-comments/2008JanMar/0102.html > ...and was also mentioned in this e-mail which was cc'ed to you: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Feb/0342.html > > Unless and until these three issues are addressed, I don't see any way in > which the ARIA proposals can be adopted in HTML5. Ian later wrote... On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 23:35 +0000, Ian Hickson wrote: > Defining how it works with HTML4 would probably be a reasonable level > at > the moment. p.s. tracker: ACTION-73 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:11:26 UTC