public-device-apis@w3.org from February 2010 by author

Adam Barth

• Re: ACTION-85: BONDI's investigation into LREST vs "conventional" JavaScript APIs (Wednesday, 3 February)

Andrew McMillan

• Re: [calendar] Draft updated (Wednesday, 3 February)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Simple LREST toying (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Simple LREST toying (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Devices as Virtual Web Services (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Devices as Virtual Web Services (Wednesday, 10 February)

Anselm R Garbe

• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Wednesday, 3 February)

Anssi Kostiainen

• Re: [Powerbox] Q's on the proposal (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: Simple LREST toying (Friday, 12 February)

Appelquist, Daniel, VF-Group

• Re: W3C TAG position on policy mechanisms for Web APIs and Services (Wednesday, 3 February)

Arthur Barstow

• Re: DAP Activity & WAC (Friday, 19 February)

Arve Bersvendsen

• Re: Simple LREST toying (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Devices as Virtual Web Services (Tuesday, 2 February)

DANIEL JESUS COLOMA BAIGES

• ACTION-46: Provide input of capability definition and semantics (Wednesday, 24 February)

David Rogers

• RE: [Powerbox] A RESTful proposal for Web enabling devices (Wednesday, 24 February)
• OMTP BONDI 1.1 Approved Release (Wednesday, 24 February)
• RE: Regrets.... (Wednesday, 10 February)

Device APIs and Policy Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-75 (respec-non-rectrack): ReSpec should support non-RecTrack override [ReSpec] (Monday, 8 February)
• ISSUE-74 (respec-multi-prev): ReSpec should support multiple previous versions (e.g. for merged documents) [ReSpec] (Monday, 8 February)
• ISSUE-73 (contacts-security): Security and Privacy Implications for PIM APIs [APIs — General] (Wednesday, 3 February)

Dirk Pranke

• Re: [Powerbox] A RESTful proposal for Web enabling devices (Friday, 19 February)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• Re: [Powerbox] latest draft (was: Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-02-24) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: SystemInfo API (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: Contacts API typical use cases and privacy considerations (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: Contacts API typical use cases and privacy considerations (Monday, 22 February)
• RE: Contacts API typical use cases and privacy considerations (Friday, 19 February)
• RE: Contacts API typical use cases and privacy considerations (Friday, 19 February)
• Contacts API typical use cases and privacy considerations (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: DAP API Exchange Control (was: RE: A comment on Security and Privacy Implications for Contact APIs) (Friday, 19 February)

Eric Uhrhane

• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: New FileWriter proposal (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Tuesday, 2 February)

Frederick Hirsch

• Proposed text for privacy requirements (Sunday, 28 February)
• Privacy paper : Privacy Issues of the W3C Geolocation API (Sunday, 28 February)
• v2 minutes 2010-02-24 (Thursday, 25 February)
• Draft minutes 2010-02-24 (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-02-24 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Concrete REST proposal timing and status (Saturday, 13 February)
• Re: Simple LREST toying (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Simple LREST toying (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: SV: Editor questions (Thursday, 11 February)
• Editor questions (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Approved 3 Feb minutes (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Draft minutes (HTML) 2010-02-10 (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Next steps for Policy Requirements draft? (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Devices as Virtual Web Services (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Devices as Virtual Web Services (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Devices as Virtual Web Services (Wednesday, 10 February)

Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston)

• Draft minutes v2 (HTML and text) 2010-02-10 (Wednesday, 10 February)

Ian Hickson

• Re: Devices as Virtual Web Services (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Monday, 1 February)

Jeremy Orlow

• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Wednesday, 3 February)

John Morris

• Regrets.... (Wednesday, 10 February)

JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA

• RE: ACTION-16 for SystemInfo API (Thursday, 25 February)

Kenton Varda

• [Powerbox] Fine-grained and non-installed providers (Saturday, 27 February)
• Re: [Powerbox] A RESTful proposal for Web enabling devices (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: [Powerbox] A RESTful proposal for Web enabling devices (Tuesday, 23 February)

Marcin Hanclik

• Regrets, RE: Should we cancel tomorrow? (Tuesday, 16 February)
• RE: Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-02-03 (Wednesday, 3 February)

Mark Baker

• Re: Concrete REST proposal timing and status (Thursday, 18 February)

Mark Seaborn

• Re: [Powerbox] Q's on the proposal (Sunday, 28 February)
• Re: [Powerbox] Fine-grained and non-installed providers (Sunday, 28 February)
• Re: [Powerbox] Q's on the proposal (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: [Powerbox] Q's on the proposal (Thursday, 25 February)

Max Froumentin

• Re: Bluetooth / NFC APIs (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: Bluetooth / NFC APIs (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: ACTION-16 for SystemInfo API (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ACTION-16 for SystemInfo API (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Contacts API typical use cases and privacy considerations (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Sensors simplified (or not) (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Sensors simplified (or not) (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Sensors simplified (or not) (Thursday, 11 February)
• Sensors simplified (or not) (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Publishing System Information API FPWD (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: Publishing System Information API FPWD (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: [sysinfo] SEMC comments (was RE: Publishing System Information API FPWD) (Monday, 1 February)

Michael A. Puls II

• File API - readAsText() - newline translation (Saturday, 6 February)

Michael Nordman

• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Monday, 1 February)

Niklas Widell

• Updated version of Messaging API available (Tuesday, 23 February)
• SV: Editor questions (Thursday, 11 February)

Nikolai Onken

• Re: Bluetooth / NFC APIs (Thursday, 25 February)
• Bluetooth / NFC APIs (Monday, 22 February)

Nilsson, Claes1

• RE: Bluetooth / NFC APIs (Friday, 26 February)
• RE: Bluetooth / NFC APIs (Thursday, 25 February)
• REST: DAP Web Server to access to local resources (Wednesday, 24 February)
• RE: Should we cancel tomorrow? (Tuesday, 16 February)
• RE: Sensors simplified (or not) (Friday, 12 February)
• RE: Sensors simplified (or not) (Thursday, 11 February)
• RE: Sensors simplified (or not) (Thursday, 11 February)
• RE: Devices as Virtual Web Services (Wednesday, 10 February)
• RE: Devices as Virtual Web Services (Wednesday, 10 February)
• RE: Devices as Virtual Web Services (Wednesday, 10 February)
• RE: Devices as Virtual Web Services (Wednesday, 10 February)
• RE: Publishing System Information API FPWD (Monday, 1 February)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• Re: A comment on Security and Privacy Implications for Contact APIs (Wednesday, 3 February)

Paddy Byers

• Regrets, RE: Should we cancel tomorrow? (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Regrets (was: Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-02-03) (Tuesday, 2 February)

richard.tibbett@orange-ftgroup.com

• RE: [Powerbox] Q's on the proposal (Friday, 26 February)
• [Powerbox] Q's on the proposal (Wednesday, 24 February)
• RE: Draft minutes 2010-02-24 (Wednesday, 24 February)
• RE: [Powerbox] latest draft (was: Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-02-24) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• RE: Contacts API typical use cases and privacy considerations (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: Contacts API typical use cases and privacy considerations (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: Contacts API typical use cases and privacy considerations (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: Contacts API typical use cases and privacy considerations (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: Contacts API typical use cases and privacy considerations (Friday, 19 February)
• RE: Contacts API typical use cases and privacy considerations (Friday, 19 February)
• RE: Contacts API typical use cases and privacy considerations (Friday, 19 February)
• RE: Contacts API typical use cases and privacy considerations (Friday, 19 February)
• RE: Contacts API typical use cases and privacy considerations (Friday, 19 February)
• DAP API Exchange Control (was: RE: A comment on Security and Privacy Implications for Contact APIs) (Thursday, 4 February)
• RE: ISSUE-73 (contacts-security): Security and Privacy Implications for PIM APIs [APIs - General] (Wednesday, 3 February)
• [calendar] Draft updated (Monday, 1 February)

Robin Berjon

• Re: REST: DAP Web Server to access to local resources (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: [Powerbox] A RESTful proposal for Web enabling devices (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Contacts API typical use cases and privacy considerations (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: DAP Activity & WAC (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Blast from the past (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: [Powerbox] A RESTful proposal for Web enabling devices (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Call today cancelled (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Should we cancel tomorrow? (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Bindings licensing (Monday, 15 February)
• Simple LREST toying (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: SV: Editor questions (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Editor questions (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Devices as Virtual Web Services (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Devices as Virtual Web Services (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Devices as Virtual Web Services (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-02-10 (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Prague F2F questionnaire (Monday, 8 February)
• Draft Minutes 2010-02-03 (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: New FileWriter proposal (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: A comment on Security and Privacy Implications for Contact APIs (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: ACTION-85: BONDI's investigation into LREST vs "conventional" JavaScript APIs (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Writing good specs (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Workshop on Access Control Application Scenarios Report (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-02-03 (Tuesday, 2 February)

Rotan Hanrahan

• RE: ACTION-16 for SystemInfo API (Tuesday, 23 February)

SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)

• RE: [Powerbox] A RESTful proposal for Web enabling devices (Wednesday, 24 February)
• ACTION-16 for SystemInfo API (Tuesday, 23 February)
• [SysInfo] Status of AI to review (Wednesday, 17 February)
• RE: Devices as Virtual Web Services (Wednesday, 10 February)

Suresh Chitturi

• ACTION-48: Propose a definition for API access control, and a possible model for policy enforcement (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Next steps for Policy Requirements draft? (Wednesday, 10 February)
• RE: [calendar] Draft updated (Tuesday, 9 February)
• RE: Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-02-03 (Tuesday, 2 February)

Thomas Roessler

• Fwd: Forward: RFC 5546 on iCalendar Transport-Independent Interoperability Protocol (iTIP) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Devices as Virtual Web Services (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Devices as Virtual Web Services (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Devices as Virtual Web Services (Wednesday, 10 February)

Tim Renouf

• Re: Bluetooth / NFC APIs (Friday, 26 February)

Tran, Dzung D

• RE: Regrets, RE: Should we cancel tomorrow? (Tuesday, 16 February)
• RE: Sensors simplified (or not) (Thursday, 11 February)
• RE: Sensors simplified (or not) (Thursday, 11 February)
• RE: Sensors simplified (or not) (Wednesday, 10 February)

Tyler Close

• [Powerbox] latest draft (was: Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-02-24) (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: [Powerbox] A RESTful proposal for Web enabling devices (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: [Powerbox] A RESTful proposal for Web enabling devices (Friday, 19 February)
• [Powerbox] A RESTful proposal for Web enabling devices (Friday, 19 February)

イアンフェッティ

• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: New filesystem/directory API proposal (Monday, 1 February)

전종홍

• RE: Bluetooth / NFC APIs (Saturday, 27 February)
• RE: DAP Activity & WAC (Wednesday, 24 February)
• DAP Activity & WAC (Friday, 19 February)

Last message date: Sunday, 28 February 2010 19:44:07 UTC