- From: 전종홍 <hollobit@etri.re.kr>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:48:20 +0900
- To: "Robin Berjon" <robin@robineko.com>
- Cc: <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Robin & Arthur, Thanks for your reply. I have the same idea with you. I think the appearance of WAC proved the importance of DAP's work. I hope also that within 12 months, we can make the APIs rapidly. Cheers, --- Jonathan Jeon -----Original Message----- From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin@robineko.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 10:38 PM To: 전종홍 Cc: public-device-apis@w3.org Subject: Re: DAP Activity & WAC On Feb 19, 2010, at 02:56 , 전종홍 wrote: > How do you think about the WAC ? I think that it's way too early to make any manner of informed judgement. At this point WAC is just a provisional name and a plan. > What is the DAP WG’s point of view about WAC ? I don't believe that it's our place as a group to comment on various industrial initiatives. The only comment I'd have relative to the announcement is that I hope that within 12 months we'll have at least some of the APIs finishes, so that might not be the most propitious moment to come here for standardisation :) -- Robin Berjon robineko — hired gun, higher standards http://robineko.com/
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 14:49:04 UTC