On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Arve Bersvendsen <arveb@opera.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:24:13 +0100, Eric Uhrhane <ericu@google.com> wrote:
>
> I think you leave the realm of "corner cases" when you're talking
>> about the behavior of the majority of systems on which the code can be
>> expected to run. And by adding these [fairly minor, IMO] restrictions
>> on filenames, your app developers don't have to write
>> platform-specific code at all--they just write to the web platform.
>>
>
> The downside to adding restrictions is that you also restrict where and how
> the Filesystem/directory API can or can't be used. If your use-case is
> roughly allowing Flickr to crawl your photo directory and upload at will,
> you're not going to get into trouble. If, on the other hand, your use-case
> is more complex (imagine something like Midnight/Norton/Total commander as a
> locally installed widget), this least-common-denominator approach is going
> to cause problems.
Those are 2 pretty distinct use cases. Maybe both need to be supported by
the API?