- From: Nilsson, Claes1 <Claes1.Nilsson@sonyericsson.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:49:13 +0100
- To: 'Ian Hickson' <ian@hixie.ch>, Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- CC: "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
You might be right. Ideally a REST approach seems more attractive. However, I express a humble view as with REST there might be issues around need for additional protocols, URIs, security etc. Claes > -----Original Message----- > From: public-device-apis-request@w3.org [mailto:public-device-apis- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ian Hickson > Sent: onsdag den 10 februari 2010 13:12 > To: Frederick Hirsch > Cc: public-device-apis@w3.org > Subject: Re: Devices as Virtual Web Services > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Frederick Hirsch wrote: > > > > Is the executive summary here: > > > > 1. Standardize Javascript APIs for all device functionality in the > DAP > > charter > > > > 2. Expose REST interface to those APIs where appropriate, using those > > APIs to implement > > Isn't the whole point of #2 to make #1 unnecessary? > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. > fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`- > .;.'
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2010 12:49:46 UTC