xml-dist-app@w3.org from July 2002 by author

Amelia A Lewis

• Re: Why XML Infosets are used in SOAP1.2 (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: mail and URIs (was RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: SMTP and GET (Tuesday, 9 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Tuesday, 9 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Tuesday, 9 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Tuesday, 9 July)

Amelia A. Lewis

• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Saturday, 6 July)

Anne Thomas Manes

• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Friday, 5 July)

Ashish Gupta

• handling merged XML file with XSL... (Tuesday, 2 July)

Asir S Vedamuthu

• RE: Comments on LC issues (Wednesday, 31 July)

Brad Taylor

• RE: SOAP 1.2 Encoding and forward references (Wednesday, 3 July)
• SOAP 1.2 Encoding and forward references (Monday, 1 July)

Carine Bournez

• Last Call Working Draft SOAP 1.2 part 0, French translation (Thursday, 25 July)

Champion, Mike

• Application or Infrastructure? (was FW: LC Comments: Web Method F eature) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• RE: Asynchronous Web Services! (Saturday, 6 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Saturday, 6 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Friday, 5 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Friday, 5 July)

Christopher B Ferris

• Re: New AFTF draft. (Thursday, 1 August)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: LC Issue 229 (Thursday, 11 July)

Dahl, Deborah A

• Comments from the Multi-modal Iinteraction WG on LC SOAP 1.2 (Monday, 29 July)

David Fallside

• ACTION REQUIRED: implementation features comments (Friday, 19 July)
• ACTION REQ: SOAP 1.2 part 1, "features" list. (Saturday, 13 July)
• SOAP 1.2 Implementation Request from XMLP WG (Monday, 1 July)

Don Mullen

• RE: fault/detail (Friday, 19 July)
• RE: LC-Issue #230 (Thursday, 11 July)
• LC-Issue #230 (Wednesday, 10 July)

Elliotte Rusty Harold

• Re: fault/detail (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: fault/detail (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: fault/detail (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: fault/detail (Tuesday, 23 July)

Eugene Kuznetsov

• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (really: REST & SOAP) (Monday, 8 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (really: REST & SOAP) (Monday, 8 July)

Frank-Thomas.Assmann@im.landsh.de

• http://www.w3.org/2000/03/29-XML-protocol-matrix (Thursday, 25 July)

Gavin Thomas Nicol

• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Sunday, 7 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Friday, 5 July)

Glen Daniels

• RE: Comments from the Multi-modal Iinteraction WG on LC SOAP 1.2 (Monday, 29 July)
• Axis implementation summary (Wednesday, 24 July)
• RE: LC-Issue #230 (Thursday, 11 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Sunday, 7 July)

Graham Klyne

• Re: Request/response correlation in Email/SMTP binding (Friday, 26 July)

Grahame Grieve

• text/xml vs. application/soap (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: fault/detail (Thursday, 18 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (really: REST & SOAP) (Monday, 8 July)

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

• RE: [Fwd: Re: AFTF: new draft (resent)] (Wednesday, 24 July)
• RE: FW: Two new Internet drafts: DIME and WS-Attachments (Thursday, 18 July)
• RE: FW: Two new Internet drafts: DIME and WS-Attachments (Wednesday, 17 July)

Herve Ruellan

• [Fwd: Re: AFTF: new draft (resent)] (Wednesday, 17 July)
• [Fwd: Re: AFTF: new draft (resent)] (Wednesday, 17 July)
• [Fwd: Re: AFTF: new draft (resent)] (Wednesday, 17 July)
• [Fwd: Re: AFTF: new draft (resent)] (Wednesday, 17 July)
• [Fwd: Re: AFTF: new draft (resent)] (Wednesday, 17 July)
• [Fwd: Re: AFTF: new draft (resent)] (Wednesday, 17 July)
• SOAP 1.2 Attachment Feature (Wednesday, 17 July)

Jacek Kopecky

• ANN: Systinet WASP SOAP 1.2 endpoint up (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Axis implementation summary (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: Comments on LC issues (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: fault/detail (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: New issues with #195 and section 3.1.5.3 (Monday, 22 July)
• Systinet Last Call comments (Friday, 19 July)
• Additional implementation feature suggestion (Friday, 19 July)
• RE: implementation features comments (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: fault/detail (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: text/xml vs. application/soap (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: fault/detail (Thursday, 18 July)
• implementation features comments (Thursday, 18 July)
• RE: FW: Two new Internet drafts: DIME and WS-Attachments (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: ACTION REQ: SOAP 1.2 part 1, "features" list. (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Issue: RPC and Encoding fault combinations (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Issue: SOAP Data Model Schema language may be necessary (related to #231) (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: FW: Two new Internet drafts: DIME and WS-Attachments (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Sunday, 14 July)
• Re: Asynchronous Web Services! (Sunday, 14 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: What is the difference between a "struct" and an "array" in the e dge case? (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: What is the difference between a "struct" and an "array" in the e dge case? (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: What is the difference between a "struct" and an "array" in the e dge case? (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: What is the difference between a "struct" and an "array" in the e dge case? (Tuesday, 2 July)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Re: AFTF: new draft (resent) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: LC-Issue #230 (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: Changing the default value of mustUnderstand to "true" (Wednesday, 3 July)

Jon Leigh

• Simulating an http post (Wednesday, 24 July)

Jonathan Marsh

• Ann: WSDL 1.2 first draft published (Tuesday, 9 July)

Jose Rodriguez

• base64 encoding (Sunday, 28 July)
• base64 (Sunday, 28 July)

Kevin Johnsrude

• RE: LC Issue 210 (Thursday, 11 July)
• LC Issue 210 (Thursday, 11 July)

Kurt Cagle

• Re: Asynchronous Web Services! (Saturday, 6 July)

Laird Popkin

• Re: text/xml vs. application/soap (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (really: REST & SOAP) (Tuesday, 9 July)

Lars von Wedel

• Request/response correlation in Email/SMTP binding (Friday, 26 July)

Marc Hadley

• Re: fault/detail (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: LC Issue 210 (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: LC Issue 210 (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: LC Issue 229 (Thursday, 11 July)
• LC Issue 229 (Thursday, 11 July)
• LC Issue 217 (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 8 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 8 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 8 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: What is the difference between a "struct" and an "array" in the e dge case? (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: What is the difference between a "struct" and an "array" in the e dge case? (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: What is the difference between a "struct" and an "array" in the e dge case? (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: SOAP 1.2 Encoding and forward references (Tuesday, 2 July)

Mark Baker

• SOAP version (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: text/xml vs. application/soap (Friday, 19 July)
• Web method values as QNames (was Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 15 July)
• SMTP and GET (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 8 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 8 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 8 July)
• "distributed computing" (Saturday, 6 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Saturday, 6 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Tuesday, 2 July)
• [Internet-Drafts@ietf.org: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-soap-media-reg-01.txt] (Monday, 1 July)

Martin Gudgin

• Re: fault/detail (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: fault/detail (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: fault/detail (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: fault/detail (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: Why XML Infosets are used in SOAP1.2 (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: Why XML Infosets are used in SOAP1.2 (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: fault/detail (Saturday, 20 July)
• Re: fault/detail (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: fault/detail (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: fault/detail (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: LC Issue 210 (Thursday, 11 July)

Mike Dierken

• mail and URIs (was RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Tuesday, 9 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Tuesday, 9 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Tuesday, 9 July)

Naresh Agarwal

• Why XML Infosets are used in SOAP1.2 (Monday, 22 July)
• RE: Asynchronous Web Services! (Monday, 8 July)
• RE: Asynchronous Web Services! (Monday, 8 July)
• Asynchronous Web Services! (Saturday, 6 July)
• RE: MEP in SOAP1.2 (Tuesday, 2 July)
• MEP in SOAP1.2 (Monday, 1 July)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• Request for some quick guidance on XMLP Issue 269 (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Re: Web method values as QNames (was Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 29 July)
• RE: LC #220 (was RE: Raw minutes of 10 July 2002) (Thursday, 25 July)
• RE: LC #220 (was RE: Raw minutes of 10 July 2002) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: AFTF: new draft (resent)] (Wednesday, 24 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (really Features optional ) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (really Features optional) (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: fault/detail (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: Comments on LC issues (Tuesday, 23 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 15 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: Changing the default value of mustUnderstand to "true" (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Tuesday, 2 July)

Paul Prescod

• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: Application or Infrastructure? (was FW: LC Comments: Web Method F eature) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 8 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (really: REST & SOAP) (Monday, 8 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (really: REST & SOAP) (Monday, 8 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Sunday, 7 July)
• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Saturday, 6 July)

Pete Hendry

• Re: Comments on LC issues (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Comments on LC issues (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: fault/detail (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: fault/detail (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: Issue: SOAP Data Model Schema language may be necessary (related to #231) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: Issue: SOAP Data Model Schema language may be necessary (related to #231) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: Issue: SOAP Data Model Schema language may be necessary (related to #231) (Tuesday, 16 July)

Ray Whitmer

• Re: Issue: SOAP Data Model Schema language may be necessary (related to #231) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: New issues with #195 and section 3.1.5.3 (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Re: Issue: SOAP Data Model Schema language may be necessary (related to #231) (Tuesday, 16 July)

Rich Salz

• Re: fault/detail (Thursday, 18 July)

Robert van Engelen

• Re: Comments on LC issues (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Comments on LC issues (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Comments on LC issues (Friday, 19 July)
• New issues with #195 and section 3.1.5.3 (Tuesday, 16 July)

rubys@us.ibm.com

• Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 15 July)

Simon Fell

• Re: fault/detail (Thursday, 18 July)
• fault/detail (Wednesday, 17 July)

Thompson, Lynne R

• RE: implementation features comments (Thursday, 25 July)
• RE: LC Issue 210 (Thursday, 11 July)

w3.ruellan@laposte.net

• New AFTF draft. (Wednesday, 31 July)

Walden Mathews

• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Tuesday, 9 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 8 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 8 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Friday, 5 July)

Williams, Stuart

• RE: LC #220 (was RE: Raw minutes of 10 July 2002) (Thursday, 25 July)
• RE: LC #220 (was RE: Raw minutes of 10 July 2002) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• FW: LC #220 (was RE: Raw minutes of 10 July 2002) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• FW: LC #219 (was RE: Raw minutes of 10 July 2002) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (really Features optional ) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (really Features optional ) (Tuesday, 23 July)
• RE: AFTF: new draft (resent) (Thursday, 18 July)
• Summary of positions on LC #227/#228 re: Web Method Feature (Tuesday, 16 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 15 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Friday, 5 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Friday, 5 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Thursday, 4 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Thursday, 4 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: MEP in SOAP1.2 (Tuesday, 2 July)
• RE: MEP in SOAP1.2 (Monday, 1 July)
• FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature (Monday, 1 July)

Yves Lafon

• Re: ACTION REQUIRED: implementation features comments (Friday, 19 July)
• RE: Application or Infrastructure? (was FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature) (fwd) (Tuesday, 9 July)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 July 2002 23:07:39 UTC