[Fwd: Re: AFTF: new draft (resent)]

Forwarded message 1

  • From: Herve Ruellan <ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 15:12:08 +0200
  • Subject: Re: AFTF: new draft (resent)
  • To: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
  • CC: w3c-xml-protocol-wg@w3.org
  • Message-ID: <3D356D28.10008@crf.canon.fr>
Marc,

> The reason for this is a that the feature is intended to be MEP 
> independent. It is designed to be used in conjunction with an MEP so 
> that, e.g. when used with the request reponse MEP both 
> reqre:OutboundMessage and reqres:InboundMessage would 'point' to 
> separate 'instances' of the attachment feature. There was a diagram 
> circulated with an earlier draft that made this much more obvious - 
> Herve, would it be worth putting it back in to the current draft.

I think it could be usefull to put an updated version in the draft. I 
did not do it for the current draft, because the stylesheet did not 
allow to do it easily.

Hervé.

Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2002 12:46:05 UTC