Re: fault/detail

At 10:54 AM +0100 7/24/02, Martin Gudgin wrote:
>You missed one, http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc
>
>Remember, thou shalt count to three, not four and five is way out,
>
>Looks like we have two too many
>

That is a lot. This doesn't feel fundamentally wrong to me, like 
having some elements in a namespace and some not, so if it makes 
sense go for it. But does it make sense? Do you actually need this 
level of differentiation? Could you distinguish based on a single 
namespace URI and the local name alone? Would life be simpler with 
just one or two namespaces for SOAP? This is a practical matter. Do 
whatever works better.
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          XML in a  Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002)          |
|              http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/              |
|  http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/  |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+