Re: fault/detail

At 9:44 PM +0100 7/23/02, Martin Gudgin wrote:


>>  My general principle is that I want all elements defined by the SOAP
>>  spec to be namespace qualified by the SOAP namespace URI defined in
>>  the SOAP spec.
>
>I believe we already have this.
>

Good. SOAP 1.1 didn't, which was one of my real bugbears about that 
spec. I still think the example in the primer is broken though, and 
that form should not be encouraged. However, at least now I don't 
have to teach it with my teeth gritted. :-)
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          XML in a  Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002)          |
|              http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/              |
|  http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/  |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+