W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > July 2002

Re: fault/detail

From: Martin Gudgin <martin.gudgin@btconnect.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 23:02:05 +0100
Message-ID: <001401c22ddd$995bfc80$b47ba8c0@zerogravitas>
To: "Simon Fell" <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

Hi Simon,

The spec I'm looking at[1] says of the Detail element;

A [namespace name] of http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope 

Did you mean detail ENTRIES[2] rather then the element itself?

Gudge

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/#faultdetailelement
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/#faultdetailentry

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Simon Fell" <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk>
To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 5:04 AM
Subject: fault/detail


> 
> I was going over part 1 and noticed that the spec mandates namespace
> qualified children for all the children elements [header, body, etc],
> except for the detail element of fault, is there a reason that detail
> shouldn't follow suit ?
> 
> Tx
> Simon
> www.pocketsoap.com
> 
Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2002 18:02:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:10 GMT