At 09:59 AM 7/26/02 +0200, Lars von Wedel wrote: >Hello, > >I'm interested in wiring SOAP via SMTP/POP/IMAP/... I saw a couple >of proposals as well as some messages on the list and the current >state of an email binding (let me call it like this) seems to be >an ongoing discussion. > >My goal is to extend an existing SOAP implementation using HTTP >towards sending via SMTP and retrieving via POP/IMAP. > >The main question I have at this time is how to establish a >correspondence >between a requests and its response: I've seen proposals for using >the Message-ID and In-reply-to headers, but somewhere else I read >that correspondence should be handled on the application level. > >What is the (currently) preferred view of handling request/response >correlation for SOAP over Email? Doing this kind of thing over Internet email protocols raises some tricky architectural issues with the protocols. Some of these are tackled in a recent RFC: ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3297.txt (which deals with content negotiation in email.) #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>Received on Friday, 26 July 2002 06:19:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:41:54 GMT