W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > July 2002

LC-Issue #230

From: Don Mullen <donmullen@tibco.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:33:18 -0400
Message-ID: <339902DC0E58D411986A00B0D03D843201B23FC1@extmail.extensibility.com>
To: "'gdaniels@macromedia.com'" <gdaniels@macromedia.com>
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org

Glen:

The working group discussed last call issue 230 [1] in the July 10
teleconference.  In 230, you ask that in section 3.1.1 -- "Requirements on
Features" -- the specification of a feature MUST include "1. A URI used to
refer to the feature." 
The group would like to make sure that you were aware that Section 3.2 "SOAP
Modules" included "MUST identify itself with a URI.", and whether this
covered your concern.  On rereading the issue, I notice that you reference
issue 203 [2], which includes this as part of the resolution, so I assume
you would still like to add URI identifiers to SOAP features as well.
The problem raised in the discussion of issue LC-230 is that SOAP features
may be abstract, and it might be difficult to give a definitive URI to them,
whereas SOAP modules are concrete, expressed as SOAP headers.
It is unclear to me whether this is a valid argument.  Any feedback you can
provide would be helpful.
Don

[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues#x230
[2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues#x203
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2002 18:38:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:10 GMT