- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 15:37:26 -0400
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "'xml-dist-app@w3.org'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, xml-dist-app-request@w3.org
+1.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Sent by: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org
07/02/2002 01:36 PM
To: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
cc: "'xml-dist-app@w3.org'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, (bcc: Noah
Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
Subject: Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature
Hey Stuart,
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 12:43:40PM +0100, Williams, Stuart wrote:
> IMO it should be possible to use either of the Request-Response or
> SOAP-Response MEPs without knowledge of the Web Method feature and that
in
> such circumstances the HTTP Method used should be POST and GET
respectively.
IMO, the method and the MEP are a priori orthogonal, so I would consider
it a mistake to attempt to derive one from the other. If you knew the
protocol you were using, then you could sometimes derive the MEP from
the method, but not the other way around IMO.
MB
--
Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org
http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2002 15:52:00 UTC