W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > July 2002

Re: LC Issue 210

From: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:47:27 +0100
Cc: "'noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com'" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
To: Kevin Johnsrude <kevinj@roguewave.com>
Message-Id: <E22553F8-94ED-11D6-AF42-0003937568DC@sun.com>

On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 05:26 PM, Kevin Johnsrude wrote:

>
> In LC #210 [1] the statement:
> Each SOAP header block element information item:
> ...
>
>  * MAY have an encodingStyle attribute information item in its
>    [attributes] property.
>
> directly contradicts the closed LC #209 [2]:
>
I disagree, 209 refers to the SOAP Header EII, 210 refers to SOAP 
header *block* EIIs (i.e. children of the SOAP Header EII). There's 
no contradiction.

Regards,
Marc.

> Section 5.1.1:
>> The encodingStyle attribute SHOULD NOT appear on the SOAP
>> Envelope [reference to 5.1], SOAP Body [reference to 5.3] or SOAP
>> Header [reference to 5.2] element information items.
> Not sure whether this should be a MUST because of the scoping rules for
> encodingStyle ?
>
> Resolution:
>     The XMLP WG has decided to close issue 209 by changing the SHOULD
>     to a MUST, in order to bring the text in agreement with the
>     schema. It considers this issue is editorial in nature.
>
> Cheers,
> Kevin
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x210
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x209
>
>
--
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
XML Technology Center, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 12:48:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:10 GMT