- From: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:47:27 +0100
- To: Kevin Johnsrude <kevinj@roguewave.com>
- Cc: "'noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com'" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 05:26 PM, Kevin Johnsrude wrote: > > In LC #210 [1] the statement: > Each SOAP header block element information item: > ... > > * MAY have an encodingStyle attribute information item in its > [attributes] property. > > directly contradicts the closed LC #209 [2]: > I disagree, 209 refers to the SOAP Header EII, 210 refers to SOAP header *block* EIIs (i.e. children of the SOAP Header EII). There's no contradiction. Regards, Marc. > Section 5.1.1: >> The encodingStyle attribute SHOULD NOT appear on the SOAP >> Envelope [reference to 5.1], SOAP Body [reference to 5.3] or SOAP >> Header [reference to 5.2] element information items. > Not sure whether this should be a MUST because of the scoping rules for > encodingStyle ? > > Resolution: > The XMLP WG has decided to close issue 209 by changing the SHOULD > to a MUST, in order to bring the text in agreement with the > schema. It considers this issue is editorial in nature. > > Cheers, > Kevin > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x210 > [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x209 > > -- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> XML Technology Center, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 12:48:07 UTC