W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > July 2002

Re: fault/detail

From: Simon Fell <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 17:43:27 -0700
To: "Martin Gudgin" <martin.gudgin@btconnect.com>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2o3cju0585h1f5kofa595ojpgt6h20h0t1@4ax.com>

Sorry, yes i meant the child elements of detail. 

Cheers
Simon

On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 23:02:05 +0100, in soap you wrote:

>Hi Simon,
>
>The spec I'm looking at[1] says of the Detail element;
>
>A [namespace name] of http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope 
>
>Did you mean detail ENTRIES[2] rather then the element itself?
>
>Gudge
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/#faultdetailelement
>[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/#faultdetailentry
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Simon Fell" <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk>
>To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 5:04 AM
>Subject: fault/detail
>
>
>> 
>> I was going over part 1 and noticed that the spec mandates namespace
>> qualified children for all the children elements [header, body, etc],
>> except for the detail element of fault, is there a reason that detail
>> shouldn't follow suit ?
>> 
>> Tx
>> Simon
>> www.pocketsoap.com
>> 
Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2002 20:40:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:10 GMT