Re: FW: LC Comments: Web Method Feature

Upon reflexion, I am wondering whether we should not just rename Web-Method GET
to something different. I know Web-Method GET is very related to HTTP GET
(although different), but it sounds like we have created confusion.

Jean-Jacques.

Marc Hadley wrote:

> Mark Baker wrote:
> >>It sounds like you are drawing a distinction between an abstract
> >>conceptual GET operation and the implementation of that operation in
> >>HTTP. Unfortunately both are being labelled with the name 'GET' so it is
> >>difficult to tell which one you are referring to in any given sentence.
> >
> > FWIW, I'm making this distinction only as an aid to explaining my point.
> > Maybe it's not working. 8-O
> >
> No, it isn't ;-). If they had different labels it might work but using
> the same term to refer to two different but related things is just plain
> confusing.

Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2002 10:03:48 UTC