W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > July 2002

Re: fault/detail

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 08:12:08 -0400 (EDT)
To: Martin Gudgin <martin.gudgin@btconnect.com>
cc: Simon Fell <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0207180811420.11418-100000@eagle.datapower.com>


> I don't feel strongly either way, I guess you could argue that for the sake
> of consistency we should mandate namespace qualification.
> 
> What do other people think?

+1

The current situation always struck me as weird.

Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 08:12:08 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Grahame Grieve: "text/xml vs. application/soap"
Previous message: Jacek Kopecky: "implementation features comments"
In reply to: Martin Gudgin: "Re: fault/detail"
Next in thread: Jacek Kopecky: "Re: fault/detail"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:10 GMT