At 16:51 18/7/2002, you wrote: >Ah, OK. It seemed reasonable that we allow people to put qualified OR >unqualified elements inside detail. > >I take it that you think we should mandate namespace qualification for >children of detail as we do for children of Header/Body ( re-reading your >initial e-mail I now realise this is what you said to begin with, sorry for >the misunderstanding on my part ). > >I don't feel strongly either way, I guess you could argue that for the sake >of consistency we should mandate namespace qualification. A number of in production services and SOAP libraries do not qualify the elements in the details. Why make it mandatory - what is the advantage? GrahameReceived on Thursday, 18 July 2002 03:14:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:41:54 GMT