public-owl-wg@w3.org from July 2008 by author

Alan Ruttenberg

• Re: Question: How do I derive the Functional Syntax grammar from the Diagrams? (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Question: How do I derive the Functional Syntax grammar from the Diagrams? (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Data stuff (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Friday, 25 July)
• Fwd: multilingual labels constraint in SKOS (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Float and double in constants, but not descriptions (was Re: A summary of the proposal for a datatype system of OWL 2 (ISSUE-126)) (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Thursday, 24 July)
• update to Rich Annotations serialization proposal (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Agenda for OWL WG Teleconference 2008-07-23 (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files (Wednesday, 16 July)
• ACTION-159 Work to collect, propose how to address issues in making rdf list vocabulary (not) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations): A proposal for closing this issue without action (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Process (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Where I am about floats, etc. (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Fwd: OWL has a problem??? (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Saturday, 5 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Question about number types (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: named graphs (was Re: Data URIs) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Action-164 suggestions (again) for unnamed individuals *in addition* to bnodes (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Action-164 suggestions (again) for unnamed individuals *in addition* to bnodes (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Action-164 suggestions (again) for unnamed individuals *in addition* to bnodes (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Issue-114 (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Issue-114 (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Tuesday, 1 July)

Alan Wu

• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Sunday, 13 July)

Axel Polleres

• Re: Phone bridge setup (was Re: I18N issues an OWL2) (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Phone bridge setup (was Re: I18N issues an OWL2) (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Phone bridge setup (was Re: I18N issues an OWL2) (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Wednesday, 9 July)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Question: How do I derive the Functional Syntax grammar from the Diagrams? (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Question: How do I derive the Functional Syntax grammar from the Diagrams? (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: Data stuff (Monday, 28 July)
• Data stuff (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: new javascript for syntax selection (Monday, 28 July)
• Fwd: Clinical terminologies to OWL (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Friday, 25 July)
• Datetime datatype (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: new javascript for syntax selection (Wednesday, 23 July)
• [Accessibility] O vs. O' and Diagrams (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Detection, where? How? (was Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114)) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Detection, where? How? (was Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114)) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Proposal to close as withdrawn ISSUE-31 (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114) (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Process (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: ISSUE-114 [RE: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: [meta] voting preparation time (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: ISSUE-31 Proposal to resolve (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations): A proposal for closing this issue without action (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Where I am about floats, etc. (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Sunday, 6 July)
• Where I am about floats, etc. (Sunday, 6 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Sunday, 6 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Sunday, 6 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Saturday, 5 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Saturday, 5 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Question about number types (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Question about number types (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: named graphs (was Re: Data URIs) (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Do we loose anything? (discussion on ISSUE-131) (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: named graphs (was Re: Data URIs) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Data URIs (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Disjointness of Double and Float and Decimal (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations): A proposal for closing this issue without action (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Examples in primer and structural spec (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: State of rich annotations (Wednesday, 2 July)
• State of rich annotations (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Issue-114 (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: State of the N-ary (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Issue-114 (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Action-164 suggestions (again) for unnamed individuals *in addition* to bnodes (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: State of the N-ary (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Action-164 suggestions (again) for unnamed individuals *in addition* to bnodes (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Issue-114 (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Action-164 suggestions (again) for unnamed individuals *in addition* to bnodes (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Use areas (Re: State of the N-ary) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: State of the N-ary (Wednesday, 2 July)
• State of the N-ary (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Issue-114 (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Issue-114 (Tuesday, 1 July)

Boris Motik

• Proposal to resolve ISSUE-135 (noontologyheader): Should be able to import rdf serialized documents without ontology headers (Thursday, 31 July)
• Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Proposal for datatypes at 3F2F (Tuesday, 29 July)
• RE: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Thursday, 24 July)
• RE: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Resolution of ISSUE-125 (Wednesday, 23 July)
• A comment about I18N proposal by Axel Polleres (ISSUE-126 and ISSUE-71) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Top and bottom roles in DL-Lite (ACTION-161) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• RE: Draft minutes from 16th of July 2008 available (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Resolution of ISSUE-67 implemented (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Draft minutes from 16th of July 2008 available (Wednesday, 16 July)
• A summary of the proposal for a datatype system of OWL 2 (ISSUE-126) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• RE: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Sunday, 13 July)
• RE: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Saturday, 12 July)
• RE: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Friday, 11 July)
• A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Thursday, 10 July)
• RE: Undiscussed DL-Lite Changes: SameIndividuals out, UNA + Functional Properties in (Thursday, 10 July)
• RE: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114) (Wednesday, 9 July)
• RE: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Wednesday, 9 July)
• RE: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Wednesday, 9 July)
• A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Tuesday, 8 July)
• RE: ISSUE-133 (una in dl-lite): DL-Lite Profile modified to include UNA (Tuesday, 8 July)
• RE: Where I am about floats, etc. (Monday, 7 July)
• RE: Where I am about floats, etc. (Monday, 7 July)
• RE: Where I am about floats, etc. - ISSUE-126 (Sunday, 6 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Friday, 4 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Friday, 4 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Friday, 4 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Wednesday, 2 July)
• RE: Issue-114 (Wednesday, 2 July)
• RE: Issue-114 (punning) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• ISSUE-16 (entity annotations): A proposal for closing this issue without action (Wednesday, 2 July)
• RE: ISSUE-132 (constant2literal): Replace usage of "constant" with "literal" as defined by RDF and XML. [editorial] (Tuesday, 1 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited (Tuesday, 1 July)

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

• Re: Question about number types (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Question about number types (Friday, 4 July)

C.M.Sperberg-McQueen

• Re: Question about number types (Friday, 4 July)

Christine Golbreich

• Re: Frozen version of OWL2 Requirements editor's draft available (Tuesday, 29 July)

Conrad Bock

• RE: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel (Thursday, 31 July)
• RE: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel (Thursday, 31 July)
• RE: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel (Thursday, 31 July)
• RE: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel (Wednesday, 30 July)

Dave Peterson

• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Monday, 7 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Sunday, 6 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Sunday, 6 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Saturday, 5 July)
• Re: Question about number types (Saturday, 5 July)
• Re: Question about number types (Friday, 4 July)

Deborah L. McGuinness

• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Data stuff (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: Data stuff (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Friday, 25 July)
• resending message on quick reference (Tuesday, 22 July)

Evan Wallace

• Re: scribe system changes (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: Data stuff (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Frozen version of OWL2 Requirements editor's draft available (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Wednesday, 9 July)
• draft of minutes from telecon of 2 July now available (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Issue-114 (Tuesday, 1 July)

Felix Sasaki

• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Wednesday, 9 July)

Héctor Pérez-Urbina

• Agenda TC 16/07/2008 (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Agenda TC 09/07/2008 (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Agenda TC 02/07/2008 (Tuesday, 1 July)

Ian Horrocks

• Proposal to resolve Issue-108 (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: new javascript for syntax selection (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Sunday, 27 July)
• Re: new javascript for syntax selection (Sunday, 27 July)
• Changes in Agenda for Boston F2F meeting (Saturday, 26 July)
• [UFDTF] Minutes and next telecon (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Differences in current OWL-R DL and OWL-R Full (Monday, 21 July)
• Agenda for F2F3 (Cambridge, MA, 28-29 July 2008) (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Saturday, 19 July)
• ISSUE-125 Proposal to resolve (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: OWL 2 Profiles and Horn-SHIQ (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Friday, 18 July)
• Teleconference.2008.07.16/Agenda (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Minutes of UFDTF Teleconference 2008.07.14 available for review (Monday, 14 July)
• ISSUE-67 use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (axiom annotation) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations): A proposal for closing this issue without action (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Undiscussed DL-Lite Changes: SameIndividuals out, UNA + Functional Properties in (Thursday, 10 July)
• Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda (Tuesday, 8 July)
• ISSUE-87 proposal to resolve (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations): A proposal for closing this issue without action (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: discussion of ISSUE-16 - was draft of minutes from telecon of 2 July now available (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Wrong action pointers in minutes (Wednesday, 2 July)
• ISSUE-128 Proposal to resolve (Wednesday, 2 July)
• ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve (Wednesday, 2 July)
• ISSUE-31 Proposal to resolve (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Wrong action pointers in minutes (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Agenda TC 02/07/2008 (Tuesday, 1 July)

Ivan Herman

• Re: new javascript for syntax selection (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Saturday, 19 July)
• Phone bridge setup (was Re: I18N issues an OWL2) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Sunday, 13 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Where I am about floats, etc. (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Where I am about floats, etc. (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Do we loose anything? (discussion on ISSUE-131) (Thursday, 3 July)
• Do we loose anything? (discussion on ISSUE-131) (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: State of the N-ary (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: State of the N-ary (Wednesday, 2 July)

Jie Bao

• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Frozen version of OWL2 Requirements editor's draft available (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: Frozen version of OWL2 Requirements editor's draft available (Monday, 28 July)
• OWL Internationalized string - update (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString (Wednesday, 9 July)

Michael Kay

• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Wednesday, 9 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Tuesday, 8 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Sunday, 6 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Saturday, 5 July)

Michael Schneider

• RE: day 1 minutes (Thursday, 31 July)
• Question: How do I derive the Functional Syntax grammar from the Diagrams? (Thursday, 31 July)
• Question: State of the DL-Semantics document (Thursday, 31 July)
• RE: Differences in current OWL-R DL and OWL-R Full (Tuesday, 22 July)
• owl:AllDifferent and owl:members (Monday, 21 July)
• Differences in current OWL-R DL and OWL-R Full (Saturday, 19 July)
• RE: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Thursday, 17 July)
• RE: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• RE: Resolution of ISSUE-67 implemented (Wednesday, 16 July)
• RE: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• RE: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• RE: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Tuesday, 15 July)
• RE: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Monday, 14 July)
• RE: ISSUE-67 use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (axiom annotation) (Monday, 14 July)
• RE: ISSUE-67 use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (axiom annotation) (Monday, 14 July)
• RE: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Sunday, 13 July)
• 9th of July Telco Minutes ready for Review (Saturday, 12 July)
• RE: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString (Wednesday, 9 July)
• RE: ISSUE-114 [RE: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] (Wednesday, 9 July)
• ISSUE-114 [RE: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] (Wednesday, 9 July)
• [meta] voting preparation time (Wednesday, 9 July)
• RE: Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] (Tuesday, 8 July)
• RE: ISSUE-31 Proposal to resolve (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Doubts about the proposal to resolve ISSUE-5 [WAS: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] (Tuesday, 8 July)
• RE: Issue-114 (Wednesday, 2 July)
• RE: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Wednesday, 2 July)
• RE: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Wrong action pointers in minutes (Tuesday, 1 July)

Michael Smith

• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Wednesday, 23 July)
• An approach to xsd:dateTime (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Float and double in constants, but not descriptions (was Re: A summary of the proposal for a datatype system of OWL 2 (ISSUE-126)) (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Undiscussed DL-Lite Changes: SameIndividuals out, UNA + Functional Properties in (Thursday, 10 July)
• RE: Undiscussed DL-Lite Changes: SameIndividuals out, UNA + Functional Properties in (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Proposal to close as withdrawn ISSUE-31 (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: ISSUE-31 Proposal to resolve (Wednesday, 9 July)
• RE: ISSUE-133 (una in dl-lite): DL-Lite Profile modified to include UNA (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Undiscussed DL-Lite Changes: SameIndividuals out, UNA + Functional Properties in (Monday, 7 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A proposal for resolution (Tuesday, 1 July)

Michel_Dumontier

• RE: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Wednesday, 9 July)
• RE: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Tuesday, 8 July)

OWL Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-136 (owl:members): Allow the use of owl:members with owl:AllDifferent (Thursday, 31 July)
• ISSUE-135 (noontologyheader): Should be able to import rdf serialized documents without ontology headers (Thursday, 31 July)
• ISSUE-134 (owl metamodel): Metamodel for OWL 2 (Wednesday, 23 July)
• ISSUE-133 (una in dl-lite): DL-Lite Profile modified to include UNA (Tuesday, 8 July)
• ISSUE-132 (constant2literal): Replace usage of "constant" with "literal" as defined by RDF and XML. [editorial] (Tuesday, 1 July)

Paul \

• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Monday, 7 July)

Pete Cordell

• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Wednesday, 9 July)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: new javascript for syntax selection (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: new javascript for syntax selection (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: Data stuff (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Draft minutes from 16th of July 2008 available (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: A possible way of going forward with OWL-R unification (ISSUE-131) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114) (Thursday, 10 July)
• OWL has a problem??? (Tuesday, 8 July)
• discussion of ISSUE-16 - was draft of minutes from telecon of 2 July now available (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Issue-114 (punning) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Tuesday, 1 July)

Peter Haase

• AW: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel (Thursday, 31 July)
• OWL 2 Metamodel (Wednesday, 30 July)

Petr Kremen

• ANN: OWLDiff 0.1 (Thursday, 24 July)

Phillips, Addison

• RE: Phone bridge setup (was Re: I18N issues an OWL2) (Monday, 21 July)
• RE: Phone bridge setup (was Re: I18N issues an OWL2) (Friday, 18 July)
• RE: I18N issues an OWL2 (Thursday, 17 July)
• a few owl i18n comments (not about language tags) (Monday, 14 July)
• RE: I18N issues an OWL2 (Monday, 14 July)
• RE: I18N issues an OWL2 (Thursday, 10 July)
• RE: I18N issues an OWL2 (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Tuesday, 8 July)

Richard H. McCullough

• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Sunday, 6 July)

Rinke Hoekstra

• Re: Proposal to resolve Issue-108 (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: new javascript for syntax selection (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: ISSUE-114 [RE: Teleconference.2008.07.09/Agenda] (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: OWL has a problem??? (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Issue-114 (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Issue-114 (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Issue-114 (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Issue-114 (Tuesday, 1 July)

Rob Shearer

• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Detection, where? How? (was Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114)) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Allowed types of punning (ISSUE-114) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: A possible structure of the datatype system for OWL 2 (related to ISSUE-126) (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Tuesday, 8 July)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: Question: How do I derive the Functional Syntax grammar from the Diagrams? (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG (Tuesday, 29 July)
• scribe system changes (Tuesday, 29 July)
• profile names (some brainstorming) (Tuesday, 29 July)
• day 1 minutes (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: new javascript for syntax selection (Sunday, 27 July)
• new javascript for syntax selection (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: I18N issues an OWL2 (Wednesday, 9 July)
• wiki fixed (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: OWL has a problem??? (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: named graphs (was Re: Data URIs) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• named graphs (was Re: Data URIs) (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Wrong action pointers in minutes (Wednesday, 2 July)

Uli Sattler

• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime (Thursday, 24 July)
• Second CfP OWLED 2008 (Tuesday, 15 July)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 July 2008 17:41:36 UTC