On Jul 10, 2008, at 11:13 AM, Rob Shearer wrote: >> Some machine's don't really have single float hardware, instead >> rounding from double float. > > I'm not sure that's relevant: all machines can mimic single float > (i.e. the double hardware can do single rounding after every > operation). > > I'd be more interested in hearing how big a user base double- > precision floats really have. Are many scientific data sets encoded > using doubles? I will investigate. -Alan > > For the record, I'd wouldn't mind requiring double-precision floats > but only 32-bit integers. Minimal implementations of such a spec > could use a single homogeneous representation for numbers in that > case. > > -rob >Received on Thursday, 10 July 2008 10:26:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 10 July 2008 10:26:19 GMT