W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > July 2008

Re: ISSUE-53 Proposal to resolve

From: Evan Wallace <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:26:59 -0400
Message-ID: <486B9E43.1070304@cme.nist.gov>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
CC: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

Bijan wrote:
> Of course, issues are just a mechanism for the chairs to manage 
> things, but I would suggest that issue-5 be closed based on the fact 
> that the raiser has, in effect, withdrawn it (see one of jeremy's last 
> email). Thus, there's no one left who owns that, and the phraseology 
> is unfortunate. ISSUE-53, on the other hand, has an in group owner, 
> has not been withdrawn, and would need an answer if we don't adopt at 
> least 3.
> Any of the technical issues in ISSUE-5 can be reraised in a better 
> context. 

I second Bijan's proposal.  While the HP issues with N-ary datatypes 
probably did push us to look more
deeply issues with datatypes (computational -vs- numeric), haven't these 
initial comments been overtaken
by events?

Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2008 15:27:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:05 UTC