- From: Evan Wallace <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:26:59 -0400
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Bijan wrote: > Of course, issues are just a mechanism for the chairs to manage > things, but I would suggest that issue-5 be closed based on the fact > that the raiser has, in effect, withdrawn it (see one of jeremy's last > email). Thus, there's no one left who owns that, and the phraseology > is unfortunate. ISSUE-53, on the other hand, has an in group owner, > has not been withdrawn, and would need an answer if we don't adopt at > least 3. > > Any of the technical issues in ISSUE-5 can be reraised in a better > context. I second Bijan's proposal. While the HP issues with N-ary datatypes probably did push us to look more deeply issues with datatypes (computational -vs- numeric), haven't these initial comments been overtaken by events? -Evan
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2008 15:27:50 UTC