W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > July 2008

Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:59:14 +0100
Message-Id: <2B91C50E-16B3-4537-A95A-7D63F32F5EB6@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: Michael Smith <msmith@clarkparsia.com>, public-owl-wg <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: "Deborah L. McGuinness" <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>

On 25 Jul 2008, at 12:45, Deborah L. McGuinness wrote:

> My applications make heavy use of xsd datetime.
> my issue in applications is that i have unpredictable data details.
> sometimes i have year, month, day,  (sometimes with and sometimes  
> without timezone)
> and sometimes i also have hour and minutes (and sometimes even  
> seconds) sometimes with and sometimes without timezone.
>
> so i would NOT support a requirement that all data either does or  
> does have a time zone ;
> i would support an approach that allows me to have optional timezones.


Then it seems to me that we need a fairly detailed proposal or  
requirements or examples from you. The datetime stuff *quickly* gets  
ratholey, esp. from an implementation point of view. If we are going  
to include *something* not essentially trivial, we need active  
champions.

And the real question, I'd wager, is what can we realistically get  
interop on. You're probably not much worse off if timezones are a non- 
standard extension than if *all* of datetime is a non-standard  
extension.

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Friday, 25 July 2008 12:03:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 25 July 2008 12:03:51 GMT