Re: Action-166 Draft sketch of how to serialize rdf annotation spaces - separate files from Bijan Parsia on 2008-07-17 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from July 2008)

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:25:37 +0100
To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <854993BE-6D74-4AEF-AA02-4E5B1C0F3E6D@cs.man.ac.uk>

On Jul 17, 2008, at 7:37 AM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
[snip]
> All of the cases I've seen SKOS, OBO, OBI, have essentially boiled  
> down to provenance information for the annotations - where a  
> synonym came from, who supplied a definition, etc. This proposal  
> covers those cases. All I've thought I've ruled out are annotations  
> on annotations on annotations (and further levels of same). Do you  
> have use cases in mind that go beyond the ones the proposal allows?  
> Could you share them?
[snip]

When I was talking with NCI folks, they said that they could settle  
for 4 levels of nesting. Upon further inquiry I wasn't able/didn't  
have time to tease it out further. I'll ping again.

Cheers,
Bijan.

Received on Thursday, 17 July 2008 07:26:27 UTC