W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > July 2008

Re: Data stuff

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:27:12 -0400
Message-Id: <BEA3C058-714A-4FEC-918D-32A39B0012BF@gmail.com>
Cc: Evan Wallace <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, public-owl-wg Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: "Deborah L. McGuinness" <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>

We still need to discuss facts of datetime. Anyone want to review the  
options and hazard a proposal?
-Alan

On Jul 28, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Deborah L. McGuinness wrote:

>>
>> Currently spec'd datatype restrictions support this don't they?
> yes - i agree .
> i am just supporting the current proposal for this point while  
> pointing out that this is my major need from this issue.

Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2008 11:27:53 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Evan Wallace: "Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime"
Previous message: Ian Horrocks: "Re: An approach to xsd:dateTime"
In reply to: Deborah L. McGuinness: "Re: Data stuff"
Next in thread: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: Data stuff"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 29 July 2008 11:27:56 GMT