belated Regrets for 28 March Telecon
Admin: Notes Telecon 28 March
REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons?
- Re: SUO: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons?
- Re: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons?
Belated Regrets 3/28 Telecon
LANG: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter?
- Re: LANG: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter?
- Re: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter?
TEST/SEM: sem-intersection test
ADMIN: Regrets for March 28 Telecon
AGENDA: A'dam ftf (draft)
Regrets for 28 March Teleconf
AGENDA: telecon Mar 28
regrets for tomorrow's telecon
ADMIN: Regrets for 2002-03-28 telecon
ALL: WG schedule
ADMIN: Face to Face Agenda Update (final agenda Delayed)
SEM: Formalization exercise
comments on OWL-lite: meaning of 'required' values
RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) 2002-03-25 (fwd)
Amsterdam ftf agenda in progress
RDF vs. OWL interpretations
WOWG: IMPORTANT - name issue
LANG: A proposal for the layering problem
- Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem
LANG: feedback on owl proposal
LANG: OWL non-xml syntax
- Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax
LANG/GUIDE: XML.com article on DAML [sic]
LANG: RDF Striped syntax, a reference
LANG: Nested Class definitions and the RDF striped syntax
- Re: LANG: Nested Class definitions and the RDF striped syntax
Regrets
Regrets for 21 Mar Teleconf
SEM: semantics for current proposal
- Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?)
- Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?)
- RE: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?)
MISC: Workshop on Semantic Web in Design and Engineering
AGENDA: Agenda/Logistics March 21 (please ignore previous)
[www-webont-wg] <none>
WSCL "well-formerdness" concept
RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night.
- RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night.
- Re: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night.
AGENDA: pre-agenda for 3/21 telecon
Regrets for F2F - Stanton - DOD
WOWG: first language proposal
- Re: WOWG: first language proposal
- Re: first language proposal
- Re: WOWG: first language proposal
- Re: WOWG: first language proposal
- Re: WOWG: first language proposal
- Re: WOWG: first language proposal
- Re: WOWG: first language proposal
Regrets for 3/21 Telecon
SEM: Integrating XML Schema and OWL
LANG: collections
GUIDE: Ontology for a simple XML Infoset
MISC: side event of A'dam ftf
ADMIN: Modified Minutes from Teleconf, 14 Mar 2002 (Review)
SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox
- Re: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox
- Re: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox
- RE: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox
- RE: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox
- RE: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox
SEM DESIDERATA: my initial desiderata list
Moving forward
- Re: Moving forward
- Re: Moving forward
- Re: Moving forward
- Re: Moving forward
- Re: Moving forward
- Re: Moving forward
ADMIN: Minutes from Teleconf, 14 Mar 2002 (Review)
- Re: ADMIN: Minutes from Teleconf, 14 Mar 2002 (Review)
- Re: ADMIN: Minutes from Teleconf, 14 Mar 2002 (Review)
ADMIN: regrets
LANG: Example ontology declaring XML Schema equivalence
LANG: owl:Ontology
Requirements Document -was- Re: GUIDE: examples
- LANG: daml:collection and owl:seq, owl:set, owl:oneOf
- Re: Requirements Document -was- Re: GUIDE: examples
ADMIN: probable regrets
ADMIN: agenda/logistics Mar 14
SEM: informal note on the layering landscape
TEST categorize test suites
GUIDE: examples
USE CASES: science applications
LANG,GUIDE: Using XQuery types to specify XML valued datatype properties
Good news!
RE: LANG: first sketch & TEST abstract syntax
ADMIN: minutes for Mar 7 telecon
LANG: frame paradigm
- Re: LANG: frame paradigm
- Re: LANG: frame paradigm
TEST: sameGuy: pls report results from software you develop/use
- Re: TEST: sameGuy: pls report results from software you develop/use
- Re: TEST: sameGuy: pls report results from software you develop/use
- TEST: sameGuy: it works with TRIPLE
TEST: maybe if/then is clearer than consistency? (more on sameGuy)
http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/projects/dql/
LANG: collect idiom for inclusion in the language
- Re: LANG: collect idiom for inclusion in the language
- Re: LANG: collect idiom for inclusion in the language
DAML query language
ADMIN: updated agenda Mar 7
an owl use/test case: sameGuy thru UnambigousProperty
LANG: first sketch
ADMIN: current focus group primaries
requirements document publication in progress
Re: ADMIN: Sign up please
WOWG: TEST: 2nd draft message
RE: WOWG: Charter issues (was RE: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn 't cut it)
ADMIN: updates to 28 Feb minutes
TEST draft message
ADMIN: agenda/logistics Mar 7
Re: Requirements document
TEST: first deliverables
Requirements Document back online
Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
Focus are summary
ISSUES: First draft of open issues document.
subgroup telecons?
REQDOC: Title change?
LANG: language features
I would like to participate in language features
ADMIN: Minutes of teleconf 28 Feb '02 (for review)
- Re: ADMIN: Minutes of teleconf 28 Feb '02 (for review)
- Re: ADMIN: Minutes of teleconf 28 Feb '02 (for review)
ADMIN: Sign Up Please
- AW: ADMIN: Sign Up Please
- RE: ADMIN: Sign Up Please
- RE: ADMIN: Sign Up Please
- TEST, ANN: TRIPLE, and Re: ADMIN: Sign Up Please
QUERY, MISC: Definition of Provenance?
TEST: entailment test cases
more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- rdf:parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it
- Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- RE: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Re: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Re: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Re: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Re: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Re: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- RE: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Re: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- RE: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- RE: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
- SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL
TEST: RE: Next steps (Action: all)
TEST: first steps
WOWG: Consensus, subgroups, and e-mail tags
Re: semantics: layering...? [was: Next steps (Action: all)]
- Re: semantics: layering...? [was: Next steps (Action: all)]
- Re: semantics: layering...? [was: Next steps (Action: all)]
how to proceed with building OWL [was Re: semantics: layering ...]
- Re: how to proceed with building OWL [was Re: semantics: layering ...]
- Re: how to proceed with building OWL [was Re: semantics: layering ...]